首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Thoracic Disease >Spontaneous ventilation versus mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Spontaneous ventilation versus mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled trial

机译:用于自发胸腔镜手术期间的自发通风与机械通风,用于自发性气胸:多中心随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: With the evolution and adoption of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), options for anesthesia control have also seen major developments. Intubated anesthesia with single lung mechanical ventilation VATS (MV-VATS) is considered the standard of care in VATS. However, this type of ventilation strategy has been associated with several adverse effects, which can trigger complications and increase the overall surgical risk. In order to avoid intubated anesthesia related adverse effects, non-intubated spontaneous ventilation VATS (SV-VATS) strategies have been proposed in recent years and widely applied. Methods: We established a two-arm parallel multicenter randomized controlled trial for comparative analysis of the outcomes of patients undergoing either SV-VATS or MV-VATS for spontaneous pneumothorax. Outcomes of interest include safety during operation, total analgesic dose, recovery time, postoperative complication rates, postoperative pain score, length of hospitalization, inflammation index, medical cost, etc. The recruitment target is 316 patients. Patients will be eligible if their chest CT is diagnosed with “localized lung bullae” and need VATS resection. Patients will be randomized into the SV-VATS (test group) or MV-VATS (control group) after signing informed consent and surgical anesthesia evaluation. Discussion: This protocol has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical university. Results will be presented at national and international meetings and conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. We will also disseminate the main results to all participants in a letter. Non-intubated SV-VATS offered a more individual choice of anesthetics and surgical method for spontaneous pneumothorax patients. Trial registration: NCT03016858; pre-results.
机译:背景:随着视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)的进化和采用,麻醉控制的选择也看到了主要的发展。具有单肺机械通风VATS(MV-VATS)的插管麻醉被认为是VATS中的护理标准。然而,这种类型的通风策略与若干不利影响有关,可以触发并发症并增加整体手术风险。为了避免插管麻醉相关的不良反应,近年来提出了未加管的自发通风VATS(SV-VATS)策略并广泛应用。方法:我们建立了双臂并联多中心随机对照试验,用于对患者患者患者或MV-VATS进行自发性肺炎的比较分析。感兴趣的结果包括在运作期间的安全,镇痛剂量,恢复时间,恢复时间,术后并发症率,术后疼痛评分,住院时间,炎症指数,医疗成本等。招聘目标是316名患者。如果胸部CT被诊断为“局部肺大疱”并需要VATS切除,患者将符合条件。在签署知情同意和外科麻醉评估后,患者将被随机分为SV-VATS(试验组)或MV-VATS(对照组)。讨论:本议定书已获得广州医科大学第一家附属医院的研究伦理委员会。结果将在国家和国际会议和会议上颁发,并在同行评审期刊上发表。我们还将在一封信中向所有参与者传播主要结果。无插管的SV-VATS为自发性气胸患者提供了更唯一的麻醉剂和外科手术方法。审判登记:NCT03016858;预先结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号