首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Translational Medicine >Real-world use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/β-blocks in Chinese patients before acute myocardial infarction occurs: patient characteristics and hospital follow-up
【24h】

Real-world use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/β-blocks in Chinese patients before acute myocardial infarction occurs: patient characteristics and hospital follow-up

机译:在急性心肌梗死之前,现实世界使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/β-嵌段发生在急性心肌梗死之前:患者特征和医院随访

获取原文
       

摘要

Current guidelines recommend angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) or β-blockers (β-B) for secondary prevention in patients after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, there is limited data to evaluate ACEI/ARB/β-B (AAβ) used before AMI on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), in China patients. This study sought to investigate whether AAβ treatment prior to AMI is associated with better hospital outcomes at the onset of AMI. A total of 2705 patients were selected from the Cardiovascular Center Beijing Friendship Hospital Database Bank, and divided into two groups on the basis of admission prescription: AAβ (n?=?872) or no-AAβ (n?=?1833). The study was also designed using propensity-score matching (226 AAβ treated patients vs 452 no-AAβ treated patients). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death and heart function and infarct size during hospitalization follow-up. The mean follow-up period was about 8?days in MACE. The Cox model showed the two groups had similar risk of cardiac death. The in-hospital mortality was 3.36% (3.33% of AAβ users and 3.38% of nonusers, p?=?0.94). In adjusted analysis, there was still no difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (3.54% vs 2.88%, p?=?0.64). However, the AAβ treated patients were associated with better heart function and smaller infarct size than the no-AAβ treated patients. The in-hospital MACE was similar between AAβ treated patients and no-AAβ treated patients. However, treatment with AAβ before AMI was associated with improved heart function and smaller infarct size.
机译:目前的准则推荐血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)或β-嵌体(β-B),用于急性心肌梗塞(AMI)后的患者中的二次预防。然而,数据有限的数据来评估在中国患者的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)之前使用的ACEI / arb /β-B(AAβ)。该研究试图调查AAβ治疗是否在AMI之前的AAβ治疗与AMI发作的更好的医院结果相关。共有2705名患者从心血管中心选出北京友谊医院数据库银行,并根据入学处方分为两组:AAβ(n?=?872)或NO-AAβ(n?= 1833)。该研究还使用倾向评分匹配设计(226AAβ处理患者与452患者治疗患者)。主要结果是在住院后随访期间心脏死亡和心脏功能和梗塞大小的复合物。平均随访时间约为8?术中的时间约为8天。 Cox模型显示两组具有类似的心脏死亡风险。住院医院死亡率为3.36%(3.33%的AAβ用户和3.38%的非用户,P?= 0.94)。在调整后的分析中,两组之间的住院内死亡率仍然没有差异(3.54%Vs 2.88%,p?= 0.64)。然而,AAβ处理的患者与更好的心脏功能和较小的梗死尺寸与NO-AAβ处理的患者相关联。医院内均术与AAβ治疗患者和NO-AAβ治疗患者相似。然而,在AMI之前用AAβ治疗与改善的心脏功能和更小的梗塞尺寸相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号