...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Threatened Taxa >A comparison of the effectiveness of methods of deterring pteropodid bats from feeding on commercial fruit in Madagascar
【24h】

A comparison of the effectiveness of methods of deterring pteropodid bats from feeding on commercial fruit in Madagascar

机译:对马达加斯加商业果汁饲喂盆地蝙蝠饲料方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

We compared the effectiveness of methods of deterring Pt eropus ru fus from feeding on commercial fruit in east central and southeastern Madagascar in 2012–2013 during the Li t chi chinensis harvest. Two of the three methods used, installing plastic flags and ringing bells in the trees, were derived from those used by litchi growers in the southeast. We improved and standardized these methods and compared their effectiveness with an organic product made from dried blood and vegetable oil (Plantskydd?) with a taste and odour aimed at deterring mammal feeding. The bats damaged from 440–7,040 g of litchi fruits per tree and two of the three methods reduced the fruit lost to bats: the plastic flags and the organic deterrent. There were significant differences in the damage levels between the study sites and between our three methods of deterrence. The plastic flags and bell ringing methods were significantly less effective in reducing the fruit bat damage compared to the taste deterrent. The latter was most effective when it had enough time to dry and adhere to the fruits after spraying and before rain. Its effectiveness was further demonstrated in flight cage experiments during which Ro us ett u s madagas cariens is avoided litchis treated with Plantskydd?. Analysis of bat faecal samples revealed no feeding preference but the collected samples contained large numbers of Ficu s seeds, suggesting that the bats feed extensively on Ficu s fruits rather than on fruit of economic importance. Apart from fruit ripeness, tree productivity or other phenological factors did not affect the amount of fruit eaten by the bats. More fruits were damaged by birds than bats at both study sites.
机译:比较了2012 - 2013年在李T Chi Chinensis收获期间在2012 - 2013年在东部中央和东南部的商业水果上喂养了PT Eropus Ru Fus的方法的有效性。使用的三种方法中的两种方法中的两种方法中的两种方法中的两种方法,源自荔枝种植者在东南部使用的方法中。我们改进和标准化了这些方法,并将其效果与由干血液和植物油(Plantykydd?)制成的有机产品,其味道和气味旨在妨碍哺乳动物进料。蝙蝠从每棵树440-7,040克的荔枝果实中受损,三种方法中的两种方法减少了损失到蝙蝠的水果:塑料旗帜和有机威慑物。研究网站与我们三种威慑方法之间存在显着差异。与味道威慑力相比,塑料标志和钟响铃方法在减少水果蝙蝠损伤方面显着较低。后者最有效的是,当它有足够的时间干燥并在喷洒后和雨前粘附在水果上。在飞行笼中进一步证明了它的有效性,在其中RO US ETT U S Madagas Cariens被避免使用PlustryDDD治疗荔枝?蝙蝠粪便样品的分析显示没有饲养偏好,但收集的样品含有大量的FICU S种子,表明蝙蝠在FICU S的水果上广泛饲喂,而不是经济重要性的果实。除了果实成熟,树生产率或其他候选因素没有影响蝙蝠吃的水果量。鸟类在两种研究地点的蝙蝠损坏了更多的水果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号