首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Telecommunications System & Management >Crime Prediction Artificial Intelligence and the Impact on Human Rights
【24h】

Crime Prediction Artificial Intelligence and the Impact on Human Rights

机译:犯罪预测人工智能与对人权的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Predicting crime is concerned with the search / examination of predisposing factors of criminal activity in people or places. Currently, there exists A.I tools which attempt to predict levels of risk of crime and facial recognition software. All of these aim to anticipate criminal decisions by tracking trigger factors. Amongst the most recognised algorithms are COMPAS (Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions), PROMETEA, Big Brother Watch, PredPol, Harm Assessment Risk Tool (HART) and Actuarial Risk Assessment Instruments (ARAIs).The aim of this paper is to determine the impact of these tools on human rights through a descriptive investigation using deductive analysis. The results demonstrate that the incorporation of A.I tools for predicting crimes does not guarantee the avoidance of discrimination or bias due to human intervention when it comes to selecting the data that feeds into the algorithm. Moreover, the so-called black box prevents reverse engineering to understand the software’s intelligent process in? the decision-making and deliberation of the factors that are being analysed, which constitutes a violation of human rights.
机译:预测犯罪涉及对人或地区的犯罪活动的概述因素的搜查/审查。目前,存在试图预测犯罪和面部识别软件风险水平的工具。所有这些旨在通过跟踪触发因素来预测刑事决策。在最公认的算法中是COMPAS(惩戒罪犯管理分析以获得替代制裁),PROMetea,大哥哥观察,PredPol,伤害评估风险工具(HART)和精算风险评估仪器(ARAIS)。本文的目的是确定通过使用演绎分析的描述性调查,这些工具对人权的影响。结果表明,掺入用于预测犯罪的工具并不能保证在选择进入算法中的数据时避免由于人为干预而导致的歧视或偏见。此外,所谓的黑匣子可以防止逆向工程来了解软件的智能过程吗?决策和审议正在分析的因素,这构成了侵犯人权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号