...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology >Endoscopist-Directed Propofol as an Adjunct to Standard Sedation: A Canadian Experience
【24h】

Endoscopist-Directed Propofol as an Adjunct to Standard Sedation: A Canadian Experience

机译:内窥镜指导的异丙酚作为标准镇静的附件:加拿大经验

获取原文

摘要

Background Sedation practices vary widely by region. In Canada, endoscopist-directed administration of a combination of fentanyl and midazolam is standard practice. A minority of cases are performed with propofol. Aims To describe the safety of nonanaesthetist administered low-dose propofol as an adjunct to standard sedation. Methods This was a single-centre retrospective study of patients having undergone endoscopic procedures with propofol sedation between 2004 and 2012 in a teaching hospital in Montreal. Procedures were performed by gastroenterologists trained in Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support. Sedation was administered by intravenous bolus by a registered nurse, under the direction of the endoscopist. Outcomes of procedures were collected in the context of a retrospective chart review using the hospital’s endoscopy database. Results Of patients undergoing endoscopies at our centre, 4930 patients received propofol as an adjunct to standard sedation with fentanyl and midazolam. Cecal intubation rate for colonoscopies ( n = 2921) was 92.0%. Gastroscopies ( n = 1614), flexible sigmoidoscopies ( n = 28), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ( n = 331) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion ( n = 36) had success rates, defined as successful completion of the procedure within anatomical limits, of 99.0, 96.4, 94.0 and 91.7%, respectively. The average dose of propofol used for each procedure was 34.5 ± 20.8 mg. Fentanyl was used in 67.4% of procedures at an average dose of 94.3 ± 17.5 mcg. Midazolam was used in 92.7% of cases at an average dose of 3.0 ± 0.7 mg. Reversal agents (naloxone or flumazenil) were used in 0.43% of the cases ( n = 21). Patients who received propofol were discharged uneventfully within the usual postprocedure recovery time. One patient required sedation-related hospitalization. For patients having received propofol in addition to standard sedation agents, 99.6% experienced no adverse events. There were no mortalities. Conclusion The use of low-dose propofol as an adjunct to fentanyl and midazolam, administered by a registered nurse under the direction of the endoscopist was safe and effective in patients at our centre.
机译:背景镇静实践因地区广泛而异。在加拿大,对芬太尼和咪达唑仑组合的内窥镜审查的施用是标准实践。少数案件用异丙酚进行。旨在描述非anaesthetist的安全性低剂量异丙酚作为标准镇静的辅助安全性。方法这是对2004年至2012年在蒙特利尔教学医院的2004年至2012年在2004年至2012年镇静手术的患者的单中心回顾性研究。程序是通过在晚期心血管寿命支持中培训的胃肠科医生进行的。通过登记的护士在内窥镜师的方向下通过静脉注射推注施用镇静。使用医院内窥镜检查数据库的回顾性图表审查的背景下收集程序的结果。 4930名患者在我们中心接受内窥镜患者的结果,接受异丙酚作为芬太尼和咪达唑仑标准镇静的辅助。结肠镜检测(n = 2921)的脑插管率为92.0%。胃镜(n = 1614),柔性六透视(n = 28),内窥镜逆行胆管桥术(n = 331)和经皮内窥镜胃术插入(n = 36)具有成功率,定义为解剖限制内的程序成功完成,为99.0 ,96.4,94.0和91.7%。用于每种程序的平均剂量为34.5±20.8mg。芬太尼以94.3±17.5 mcg的平均剂量为67.4%的程序。咪达唑仑以92.7%的病例,平均剂量为3.0±0.7mg。在0.43%的情况下使用逆转剂(Naloxone或氟嗪硅)(n = 21)。接受异丙酚的患者在通常的审核恢复时间内不受平衡。一个患者需要镇静相关住院治疗。对于除标准镇静剂外,接受过丙摩洛的患者,99.6%没有不良事件。没有死亡。结论使用低剂量异丙酚作为芬太尼和咪达唑仑的辅助,在内窥镜前的方向上施用,在我们中心的患者中是安全可有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号