首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Risk and Financial Management >Mainstreaming Global Sustainable Development Goals through the UN Global Compact: The Case of Visegrad Countries
【24h】

Mainstreaming Global Sustainable Development Goals through the UN Global Compact: The Case of Visegrad Countries

机译:通过联合国全球契约将全球可持续发展目标纳入主流:VISEGRAD国家的案例

获取原文
           

摘要

Since 2016, the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC), one of the most prominent worldwide corporate social responsibility and sustainability initiatives, has been linked to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, despite the enormous scholarly interest in the UNGC since the very beginning, its impact on the integration of the SDGs into the business activities, risk management and reporting of its participants remains understudied. This paper examines support and action for the SDGs among companies from the Visegrad Four (V4) countries. It attempts to find out whether the recent UNGC efforts result in their mobilisation towards the SDGs’ implementation or merely creates a new space for instrumental adoption to improve image and reputation. The paper adopts qualitative content analysis of 42 Communications of Progress (COPs), submitted by 25 companies from the V4 in 2017–2019. The related self-assessments in the UNGC Participation Database were also used. It reveals that the companies obviously fulfil their obligation to report their activities related to SDGs but fail to provide relevant details. Moreover, divergences between the challenges faced by V4 countries and the priorities of the companies related to individual SDGs are also identified. This raises serious concerns about the UNGC’s practical effects.
机译:自2016年以来,联合国全球契约(UNGC)是最着名的全球社会责任和可持续发展举措之一,已与可持续发展目标(SDGS)有关。然而,尽管在UNGC的巨大学术兴趣以来,自从一开始,其对将SDG集成到业务活动,风险管理和其参与者的报告中的影响仍然被解读。本文审查了VISEGRAD四(V4)国家公司之间的SDGS的支持和行动。它试图了解最近的UNGC努力是否导致他们的动员转向SDGS的实施,或者仅仅为改善图像和声誉创造一个新的空间,以便采用乐器。本文采用了42份进展通信(警察)的定性内容分析,由2017 - 2019年v4的25家公司提交。还使用UNGC参与数据库中的相关自我评估。它揭示了公司显然履行了与SDG相关的活动的义务,但未能提供相关细节。此外,还确定了V4国家面临的挑战与与个人SDGS相关的公司的优先事项之间的分歧。这提出了对UNGC的实际效果的严重担忧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号