首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Korean medical science. >Comparison of Angiographic Outcomes of Side Branch Ostium at Bifurcation Coronary Lesion between Two-stent and One-stent Techniques
【24h】

Comparison of Angiographic Outcomes of Side Branch Ostium at Bifurcation Coronary Lesion between Two-stent and One-stent Techniques

机译:双支架和单支架技术与一支冠状病变侧分支骨质血管造影结果的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Although the favored strategy for coronary bifurcation intervention is stenting main vessel with provisional side branch (SB) stenting, we occasionally use two-stent strategy. The objective of this study was to investigate the angiographic outcome of SB ostium in two-stent group, compared with one-stent group. We analyzed 199 patients with bifurcation lesion who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent and follow up angiography. The patients were divided into one-stent group (167 lesions, 158 patients) and two-stent group (41 lesions, 41 patients). Prior to intervention, SB ostium minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was smaller in two-stent group than in one-stent group (1.08±0.55 mm vs. 1.39±0.60 mm; P =0.01). But, immediately after PCI, SB MLD of two-stent group became greater than that of one-stent group (2.41±0.40 mm vs. 1.18±0.68 mm; P Graphical Abstract
机译:虽然冠状动脉分叉干预的青睐策略是用临时侧分支(SB)支架的主体,但我们偶尔使用双支架策略。该研究的目的是探讨与单支架组相比的两支支架组中Sb oStium的血管造影结果。我们分析了199例分叉病变的患者,患有药物洗脱支架的经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)和后续血管造影。将患者分为一支支架组(167例,158名患者)和双支架组(41例,41名患者)。在干预之前,两支支架组的Sb Ostium最小腔直径(MLD)小于单支架组(1.08±0.55mm与1.39±0.60mm; p = 0.01)。但是,在PCI之后,两支支架组的SB MLD变得大于单支架组(2.41±0.40 mm与1.18±0.68 mm; P图形摘要

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号