首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Comparison between one-stent versus two-stent technique for treatment of left main bifurcation lesions: A large single-center data
【24h】

Comparison between one-stent versus two-stent technique for treatment of left main bifurcation lesions: A large single-center data

机译:单支架和双支架技术治疗左主干分叉病变的比较:大型单中心数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BackgroundComparisons between one- and two-stent strategies for unprotected left main (UPLM) coronary bifurcation disease have yielded inconsistent results. This large-sample, long-term follow-up study comparatively assessed stenting strategy impact in patients with distal left main disease.
机译:背景对于未保护的左主干(UPLM)冠状动脉分叉病变的一支架和两支架策略之间的比较已产生不一致的结果。这项大型样本长期随访研究比较了支架置入策略对左主干远端疾病患者的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号