首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Medical Research >Adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia versus isolated adductor canal block in reducing pain and opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia versus isolated adductor canal block in reducing pain and opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:联合膝关节关节置换术后局部浸润镇痛与局部浸润镇痛与局部接合物管障碍相结合的接合障碍障碍:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) to adductor canal block (ACB) for pain control after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Two reviewers independently searched for potentially relevant published studies using electronic databases, including PubMed? (1966 to June 2019), Embase? (1974 to June 2019) and Web of Science (1990 to June 2019). The results were pooled using the random-effects model to produce standard mean differences for continuous outcome data and odds ratio for categorical outcome data. Results A total of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three non-RCTs were included for data extraction and meta-analysis. There were significant differences between the two groups regarding the postoperative pain score on postoperative day (POD) 0 and POD 1. The cumulative opioid consumption in the ACB plus LIA groups was significantly lower than that in the ACB groups on POD 0 and POD 1. No significant differences were found in terms of postoperative range of motion or length of hospitalization. Conclusion ACB plus LIA significantly reduced the postoperative pain score on POD 0 and POD 1 compared with isolated ACB. In addition, ACB plus LIA was associated with a significant reduction in opioid consumption during the early postoperative period.
机译:目的探讨局部渗透镇痛(LIA)对临床关节置换术(TKA)后疼痛控制的局部渗透镇痛(LIA)对局部浸润镇痛(ACB)的疗效和安全性。方法使用电子数据库独立搜查两项审阅人员,包括PubMed的潜在相关的已发布研究? (1966年至2019年6月),Embase? (1974年至2019年6月)和科学网(1990年至2019年6月)。使用随机效应模型汇集结果,以产生标准平均差异,以获得分类结果数据的连续结果数据和赔率比。结果共有三项随机对照试验(RCT)和三个非RCT,用于数据提取和荟萃分析。两组之间关于术后日(POD)0和POD1的术后疼痛评分之间存在显着差异。ACB Plus LIA组中的累积阿片类药物显着低于POD 0和POD 1上的ACB组中的累积表。在术后运动范围或住院时间范围内没有发现显着差异。结论ACB Plus Lia与分离的ACB相比,POD 0和POD 1上的术后疼痛评分显着降低。此外,ACB Plus Lia在术后早期消费的显着降低有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号