首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Medical Research >Gasless Laparoscopy versus Conventional Laparoscopy in Uterine Myomectomy: A Single-Centre Randomized Trial
【24h】

Gasless Laparoscopy versus Conventional Laparoscopy in Uterine Myomectomy: A Single-Centre Randomized Trial

机译:无气腹腔镜与常规腹腔镜检查在子宫肌瘤切除术:单中心随机试验

获取原文
           

摘要

In a single-centre, randomized trial, gasless laparoscopic myomectomy was compared with conventional laparoscopic myomectomy. The study examined feasibility, safety, reliability and post-operative outcomes. Estimated blood loss, duration of surgery, early post-operative outcomes and length of hospital stay were recorded. Compared with conventional laparoscopic myomectomy, gasless laparoscopy resulted in significantly lower intra-operative blood loss (median 100 ml vs 80 ml, respectively) and duration of surgery (median 94 min vs 71 min, respectively). Post-operative abdominal drainage volume was significantly lower after gasless laparoscopy than after conventional laparoscopy (median 100 ml vs 240 ml). There was no significant difference between duration of post-operative fever, post-operative time to flatus or length of hospital stay. Both forms of laparoscopy are suitable for uterine myomectomy, and comparison of these methods showed that gasless laparoscopy had potential advantages over conventional laparoscopy.
机译:在单中心,随机试验中,与常规腹腔镜肌瘤切除术进行比较无气腹腹腔镜切除术。该研究检查了可行性,安全性,可靠性和术后结果。记录了估计的血液损失,手术持续时间,持续的术后结果和医院住宿时间。与常规腹腔镜肌瘤切除术相比,无气体腹腔镜检查导致术中血液损失显着降低(分别为100ml vs 80ml,持续时间)和手术持续时间(分别为94 min 71分钟)。在无气体腹腔镜检查后术后腹部排水量显着低于常规腹腔镜检查(中值100ml 240mL)后显着降低。术后发烧的持续时间没有显着差异,术后时间到平静或住院时间。两种形式的腹腔镜检查适用于子宫肌瘤切除术,并且这些方法的比较表明无气腹腔镜检查具有与常规腹腔镜检查的潜在优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号