首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry >A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of erbium: yttrium–aluminum–garnet and diode lasers in smear layer removal and dentin permeability of root canal after biomechanical preparation – A scanning electron microscopy study
【24h】

A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of erbium: yttrium–aluminum–garnet and diode lasers in smear layer removal and dentin permeability of root canal after biomechanical preparation – A scanning electron microscopy study

机译:铒的效果的比较评价:钇 - 铝 - 石榴石和二极管激光器在生物力学制剂后根管的涂抹层去除和牙齿渗透性 - 一种扫描电子显微镜研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction: The chemomechanical preparation of root canal dentin with hand or rotary instruments creates debris and a smear layer. Root canal preparation (RCP) along with irrigants is not effective in cleaning apical portions, and hence, different laser activation systems were used for better cleaning in the apical third. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of erbium: yttrium–aluminum–garnet (Er:YAG) and diode laser irradiation in smear layer removal and dentin permeability after biomechanical preparation using scanning electron microscopic investigation. Material and Methods: Thirty sound single-rooted human teeth were distributed randomly and equally into three groups (n = 10 each) based upon the type of laser irradiation after RCP: Group I (control group) – RCP with ProTaper rotary system using the standard irrigating protocol; Group II – RCP with ProTaper rotary system using the standard irrigating protocol followed by diode laser irradiation; and Group III – RCP with ProTaper rotary system using the standard irrigating protocol followed by Er:YAG laser irradiation. After root sectioning, specimens were dehydrated, then gold plated and observed using a scanning electron microscopy. Then, the smear layer scores were recorded and performed using the statistical analysis. Results: Smear layer removal efficacy of Er:YAG laser was more at coronal, middle, and apical third when compared to Group I and Group II. Debris removal score of Group III (Er:YAG) was better than Group I (17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) and Group II (diode). Conclusion: Er:YAG laser-activated RCP was comparatively efficient in cleaning the smear layer and dentinal tubules opening.
机译:简介:用手或旋转仪器的根管牙本质的化学力学制剂产生碎片和涂片层。根管制备(RCP)以及送料在清洁顶端部分无效,因此,使用不同的激光激活系统在顶端第三的更好地清洁。目的:本研究的目的是比较铒 - 铝 - 石榴石(ER:YAG)和二极管激光照射在使用扫描电子显微镜研究后的涂片层去除和牙齿渗透性的二极管激光照射。材料和方法:基于RCP:I族(对照组) - RCP的激光照射的类型,三十个声音单根人牙齿分布到三组(N = 10各自)(对照组) - RCP,使用该标准的预换剂旋转系统灌溉协议;第II族 - RCP采用原型旋转系统,使用标准灌溉协议,然后是二极管激光照射;和III组 - 具有使用标准灌溉协议的预制型旋转系统的RCP,然后是ER:YAG激光照射。在根切片后,将样品脱水,然后使用扫描电子显微镜观察并观察。然后,使用统计分析记录和执行涂片层分数。结果:与I族和II族相比,ER的涂片层去除功效:YAG激光更多在冠状,中间和顶端第三。 III组(ER:YAG)的碎片去除得分优于I(17%乙二胺四乙酸)和II族(二极管)。结论:ER:YAG激光活化的RCP在清洁涂片层和牙本质管开口方面相对有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号