首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences >Removal of Smear Layer by Two Endodontic Irrigation Solutions and Erbium: Yttrium, Aluminum, Garnet (Er:YAG)Laser. A Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Study
【24h】

Removal of Smear Layer by Two Endodontic Irrigation Solutions and Erbium: Yttrium, Aluminum, Garnet (Er:YAG)Laser. A Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Study

机译:两种牙髓冲洗液和Er去除Y污层:钇,铝,石榴石(Er:YAG)激光。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)研究

获取原文
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of 17% Ethylene,di-amine, tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), 6% phosphoric acid and Erbium: Yttrium, Aluminum, Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser in removing the smear layer by scanning electron microscopy. METHODS: In this study, 80 single-rooted human teeth were selected. Instrumentation was done by use of hand files and step-back technique up to file #40 at apical and file #80 at coronal area. During instrumentation, 1ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) was used as irrigation between each file. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups with different methods of smear removal.17% Ethylene, di-amine, tetra-acetic acid was used in group 1, 6% Phosphoric acid in group 2, Erbium: Yttrium, Aluminum, Garnet laser in group 3, and no intervention in group 4 (as control). Roots were then longitudinally sectioned and prepared for scanning electron micrograph in cervical, middle and apical areas. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Walis, Mann-Whitney, Friedman and Wilcoxson tests ( P &0.05). RESULTS: The results showed a significant difference in smear layer removal between three methods in favor of the EDTA ( P &0.001) and Phosphoric groups ( P &0.001) with no significant difference between them ( P =0.49). Although Er:YAG laser showed some limited ability to remove the smear layer, the effectiveness was not significantly different from the control group ( P =0.157). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this study, EDTA and Phosphoric acid were effective methods to remove smear layer from the root canal walls but Er:YAG laser showed less efficacy compared to the other experimental groups.
机译:简介:本研究的目的是确定17%的乙烯,二胺,四乙酸(EDTA),6%的磷酸和Er:钇,铝,石榴石(Er:YAG)激光对去除的影响通过扫描电子显微镜观察涂片层。方法:本研究选择了80颗单根人牙。通过使用手动锉刀和后退技术完成器械的安装,直到根尖的锉刀#40和冠状区域的锉刀#80。在仪器安装过程中,每个文件之间使用1ml的5.25%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)进行灌溉。牙齿被随机分为四组,使用不同的去污方法。第1组使用17%的乙烯,二胺,四乙酸,第2组使用6%的磷酸,in:钇,铝,石榴石激光第3组,第4组没有干预(作为对照)。然后将根进行纵向切片,并准备在颈,中和根尖区域扫描电子显微照片。数据通过Kruskal-Walis,Mann-Whitney,Friedman和Wilcoxson检验进行分析(P <0.05)。结果:结果表明,三种方法对EDTA(P <0.001)和磷基团(P <0.001)的支持在污迹层去除上有显着差异,两者之间无显着性差异(P = 0.49)。尽管Er:YAG激光显示去除涂片层的能力有限,但其有效性与对照组并无显着差异(P = 0.157)。结论:基于本研究的结果,EDTA和磷酸是清除根管壁污渍层的有效方法,但与其他实验组相比,Er:YAG激光的疗效较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号