首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Extreme Events >First Policy, Then Action: A Co-Production Approach to Understand the Application of Urban Climate Knowledge in Land Use Planning
【24h】

First Policy, Then Action: A Co-Production Approach to Understand the Application of Urban Climate Knowledge in Land Use Planning

机译:第一款政策,然后采取行动:一种制作方法,了解城市气候知识在土地利用规划中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Barriers to the application of climate science in land use planning are often understood as a problem related to perceived disciplinary knowledge gaps. This paper argues that, instead, limitations to the application of knowledge are not strictly linked to transference, but are also attributed to the thought processes that planners use to understand and use information. This study uses an interactional co-production framework from Science and Technology Studies (STS) to explore these processes in the context of heat response planning in Chatham County, Georgia, in the United States: a coastal county exposed to hot and humid conditions that render its population, particularly its growing elderly and low-income, vulnerable to heat health risks. We specifically focus on the processes used by planners during a heat response planning workshop, exploring the discussions and actions taken to develop a plan. We attempt to answer the following questions: What are the processes used by planners to respond to climatic issues such as heat vulnerability? How do these processes determine the application of the scientific knowledge produced? How does this process enable or limit the use of climate knowledge in decision making at the city scale? This paper argues that planners engage in three steps to determine the applicability of climate knowledge to urban planning: (1) using their own experiences to contextualize and visualize the information in their community, (2) being extremely cautious about the use of information because of a fear of failure, and (3) asking for specific policies to be in place to justify and legitimate actions and promote projects throughout the city. Using these insights, this paper concludes with some thoughts on how climate knowledge might be better integrated into urban planning.
机译:在土地利用规划中,气候科学应用的障碍通常被理解为与感知学科知识差距有关的问题。本文认为,相反,对知识应用的限制并没有严格与转移相关联,但也归因于规划人员使用理解和使用信息的思想流程。本研究采用来自科技研究(STS)的互动共同生产框架(STS),在佐治亚州查塔姆县的热响应规划中探索这些过程:沿海县暴露于炎热和潮湿的条件其人口,特别是其成长的老年人和低收入,易受热卫生风险。我们专注于策划人员在热响应计划研讨会中使用的过程,探索开发计划的讨论和行动。我们试图回答以下问题:规划者使用的过程是什么,以响应热漏洞等气候问题?这些过程如何确定所产生的科学知识的应用?该过程如何在城市规模决策中启用或限制气候知识的使用?本文认为,规划人员参与了三个步骤,以确定气候知识对城市规划的适用性:(1)利用自己的体验来形成社区中的信息,(2)由于提供信息而非常谨慎恐惧失败,(3)要求具体政策,以证明和合法的行动,促进整个城市的项目。本文使用这些洞察力,结论了一些关于气候知识如何更好地融入城市规划的思考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号