首页> 外文期刊>Environmental science & policy >Co-production of knowledge–action systems in urban sustainable governance: The KASA approach
【24h】

Co-production of knowledge–action systems in urban sustainable governance: The KASA approach

机译:城市可持续治理中知识行动系统的联合生产:KASA方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines how knowledge–action systems – the networks of actors involved in the production, sharing and use of policy-relevant knowledge – work in the process of developing sustainable strategies for cities. I developed an interdisciplinary framework – the knowledge–action system analysis (KASA) framework – that integrates concepts of the coproduction of knowledge and social order with social network analysis tools to analyze existing configurations of knowledge–action systems in the city of San Juan, Puerto Rico, and how these are shaping both what we know and how we envision the future of cities. I applied KASA in the context of land use and green area governance and found that a diverse network of actors are contributing diverse knowledge types, thus showing potential for innovation in governance. This potential is conditioned, however, by various political and cultural factors, such as: (1) actors dominating knowledge about land use are the same ones that control urban land resources, (2) conventional planning expertise and procedures dominate over other alternative ways of knowing; (3) multiple visions and boundary arrangements co-exist in the city, and (4) boundary spanning opportunities limited by assumptions that knowledge and action should be done in distinct spheres of city planning. This study shows that developing adaptive and innovative capacities for sustainability is not solely a matter of harnessing more science, but about managing the politics of knowledge and visions that emerge from complex governance systems.
机译:本文研究了知识行动系统(参与生产,共享和使用与政策相关的知识的行为者网络)在制定城市可持续战略的过程中如何运作。我开发了一个跨学科框架-知识行动系统分析(KASA)框架,该框架将知识和社会秩序共同生产的概念与社交网络分析工具集成在一起,以分析波多黎各圣胡安市现有的知识行动系统配置Rico,以及它们如何塑造我们所了解的以及我们如何展望城市的未来。我在土地利用和绿地治理的背景下应用了KASA,发现多元化的参与者网络正在贡献各种知识类型,从而显示了治理创新的潜力。但是,这种潜力取决于各种政治和文化因素,例如:(1)掌握土地使用知识的主体与控制城市土地资源的主体相同;(2)传统的规划专业知识和程序主导着其他的替代方式。会心; (3)多种愿景和边界安排在城市中共存,(4)跨越边界的机会受到假设的认识和行动应在城市规划的不同领域中进行限制。这项研究表明,发展可持续性的适应性和创新能力不仅是利用更多科学的问题,而且还涉及管理复杂治理系统中出现的知识政治和远见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号