首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education and Practice >Longitudinal Comparative Study: Females’ vs. Males’ Graduation Outcomes in Undergraduate Engineering
【24h】

Longitudinal Comparative Study: Females’ vs. Males’ Graduation Outcomes in Undergraduate Engineering

机译:纵向研究:本科工程中的女性与男性的毕业结果

获取原文
       

摘要

Increasing post-secondary enrolments, reducing university-drop-outs, while, simultaneously, boosting graduation-rates, is a worldwide-dilemma, currently challenging any-university and any-educational-system. One of the most-pressing-issues facing universities, however, is the number of students, who fail to graduate. The literature-survey on gender-differences in scholastic-performance indicates mixed-results. The outcome of ‘‘degrees awarded’’ is a commonly-used-indicator in assessing the efficacy and effectiveness of engineering-programs. This-study conducted a comparative-examination of undergraduate “degrees awarded” to females and males, for the period between 2003 and 2014, over five-undergraduate engineering-programs at School of Engineering (SOE), Moi University (MU). The analysis is based not only on graduation-numbers, but on deeper-differentiation in terms of six-types of graduation-outcomes (degree-classification). In addition, the study attempted to determine whether there are significant-gender- differences in graduation-types and rates, among undergraduate-students at SOE, MU. This-study also reviewed the individual-and institutional-level-factors, that jointly predict students’ likelihood of completing a bachelor’s degree in engineering. This-article is an account from a larger gender-related-study based on SOE, MU. Major-finding of the-study is that, female-undergraduate engineering-students performed as well as, and in some-instances, even better, than their-male-counterparts. The study recommended several-areas for further-research, as well as, specific-recommendations (departmental and school-level) as to how to increase graduation-rates.
机译:提高次要后招生,减少大学辍学,同时提高毕业率,是一个全球困境,目前挑战了任何大学和任何教育系统。然而,大学面临的最紧迫问题之一是学生的数量,谁没有毕业。关于学术绩效性能的性别差异的文献调查表明了混合结果。 “奖励学位”的结果是评估工程计划的疗效和有效性的常用指标。本研究对2003年至2014年期间,2003年至2014年期间,在工程学院(SOE),MOI大学(MU)的五个本科工程方案中,对女性和男性进行了比较审查。分析不仅基于毕业编号,而且在六种毕业结果(学位分类)方面更深入。此外,该研究试图确定在SOE,MU的本科生中毕业类型和率是否存在显着性差异。本研究还审查了个人和机构层面因素,共同预测学生在工程学士学位完成学生的可能性。本文是基于SOE,MU的更大性别相关研究的账户。研究的主要发现是,女本科工程 - 学生以及在某些情况下,甚至更好,而不是他们的男性对方。该研究推荐了几个进一步研究的领域,以及如何提高毕业率的特定建议(部门和学校)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号