首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education and Practice >Who Won the Debate in Women Education? Rousseau or Wollstonecraft?
【24h】

Who Won the Debate in Women Education? Rousseau or Wollstonecraft?

机译:谁赢得了女性教育的辩论?卢梭或沃尔斯顿人?

获取原文
       

摘要

Curriculum framework in the education of children became debatable during the enlightenment. Jean-Jacque Rousseau's treatise, Emile , outlined an educational curriculum based on natural rights. Rousseau thought education should be based on espousing and exploring the natural abilities of a person. Therefore, since women have a natural responsibility of care giving, their education should be given in line with helping them to enhance these natural caring abilities. Wollstonecraft, an enlightened philosopher, took on a literary protest against Rousseau's sexual politics in her treatise, A Vindication of the Rights of Women . This paper will show why Wollstonecraft’s idea is worth considering, in that it points the way past and out of a world of discrimination to create nondiscriminatory educational concept for future generation. Since discriminatory educational ideologies perpetrates in contemporary societies in diverse fashions, this paper challenges such cultures to rethinking the imperativeness of women education.
机译:儿童教育课程框架在启蒙期间变得更加难以扩张。 Jean-Jacque Rousseau的论文,Emile,概述了基于自然权利的教育课程。卢梭思想教育应基于支持和探索一个人的自然能力。因此,由于妇女对护理捐赠的自然责任,他们的教育应符合帮助他们提高这些自然关怀能力。一个开明的哲学家WollstoneCraft,在她的论文中采取了对卢梭的性政治的文学抗议,是妇女权利的诉讼。本文将展示为什么沃尔斯隆文Craft的想法值得考虑,因为它指出过去和歧视世界的方式为未来一代创造无耻的教育理念。由于歧视性教育意识形态以多样性的时尚在当代社会中犯下了当代社会,因此本文挑战了重新思考妇女教育不足的文化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号