首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine >Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine?
【24h】

Global spinal deformity from the upper cervical perspective. What is “Abnormal” in the upper cervical spine?

机译:全球脊柱畸形从上部颈椎视角。上颈椎的“异常”是什么?

获取原文
           

摘要

Hypothesis: Reciprocal changes in the upper cervical spine correlate with adult TL deformity modifiers. Design: This was a retrospective review. Introduction: The upper cervical spine has remarkable adaptability to wide ranges of thoracolumbar (TL) deformity. Methods: Patients 18 years with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and complete radiographic data at baseline (BL) and 1 year were identified. Patients were grouped into component types of the Roussouly classification system (Type 1: Pelvic incidence [PI] 45° and lumbar lordosis [LL] apex below L4; Type 2: PI 45° and LL apex above L4; Type 3:45°65°). Patients were categorized by increasing severity of Schwab modifiers at BL (0, +, and ++) and further grouped by regional malalignment moving cranially (P: pelvic only; LP: lumbopelvic; TL: thoracic and LP; C: subaxial and TL). Analysis of variance and Pearson's r assessed changes in BL upper cervical parameters (C0-2, C0 slope, McGregor's Slope [MGS], and CBVA) across groups. Results: A total of 343 ASD patients were analyzed. When grouped by BL Schwab and Roussouly, Group P had the lowest BL disability compared to other Groups, while Roussouley Type 1 correlated with higher BL disability compared to Type 2. Moving cranially up the spine, Group P, Group LP, and Group TL did not differ in C0-2 angle, C0 slope, MGS, or CBVA. Group C had a significantly smaller C0-C2, and more negative MGS, C0 slope, and CBVA than noncervical groups. Type 1 trended slightly higher CBVA and MGS than types 2–4, but no differences in cervical lordosis, C0-C2, or C0S were found. MGS ( r = ?0.131, P = 0.015), CBVA ( r = ?0.473, P 0.001), and C0S ( r = ?0.099, P = 0.042) correlated most strongly with sagittal vertical axis (SVA) compared to other Schwab modifiers. We found SVA 34 mm predicted a 1 unit (°°) decrease in MGS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.970 [0.948–0.993], P = 0.010), while cervical SVA 51 mm predicted a 1 unit increase in MGS (OR: 1.25 [1.12–1.38], P 0.001). Conclusions: Our study suggests that upper cervical alignment remains relatively stable through most broad variations of adult TL deformity. Changes in SVA correlated most with upper cervical changes.
机译:假设:上颈椎的互殖变为与成年TL畸形改性剂相关。设计:这是回顾性审查。简介:上部颈椎对胸瘤(TL)畸形的宽范围有显着的适应性。方法:患者> 18岁,成人脊柱畸形(ASD)和基线(BL)和1年的完整放射线数据。患者被分组成组分类型的鼠标分类系统(1型:盆腔发射[PI] <45°和腰椎病症[LL] Apex以下L4; 2型:PI <45°和LL顶点在L4上方; 3:45 °65°)。通过增加Bl(0,+和++)的Schwab改性剂的严重程度来分类患者,并通过颅脑恶性移动(仅限P:Pelvic; LP:Lp:Lp:胸部和LP; C:Subaxial和TL)进行分类。横跨组的差异分析和Pearson的R评估BL上宫颈参数(C0-2,C0斜率,McGregor的斜率[MGS]和CBVA)的变化。结果:分析了343例ASD患者。当Bl Schwab和Roussouly分组时,与其他群体相比,P组对BL残疾进行了最低的BL障碍,而Roussouley型与较高的BL残疾相关与2.移动脊柱,组P,Group LP和组TL。 C0-2角度,C0斜率,MGS或CBVA没有不同。 C组具有明显较小的CO-C2,更负的Mgs,C0斜率和CBVA,而不是非诊所基团。 1型趋势略高于CBVA和Mgs,而不是2-4型,但没有发现颈椎病,C0-C2或C0s的差异。 Mgs(r = 0.131,p = 0.015),CBVA(R = 0.473,P <0.001)和C0s(r =Δ0.099,p = 0.042)与其他施瓦布相比,矢状纵轴(SVA)最强烈地相关修饰符。我们发现SVA> 34mm预测的1个单位(°)减少mgs(差距[或]:0.970 [0.948-0.993],P = 0.010),而颈椎SVA> 51mm预测MGS的1个单位增加(或者:1.25 [1.12-1.38],p <0.001)。结论:我们的研究表明,通过大多数成年TL畸形变化,上宫颈对齐仍然相对稳定。 SVA的变化与上颈部变化相关。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号