...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects >Assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: A randomized controlled trial

机译:评估恢复程序疼痛控制疼痛控制的评估:随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background. Local anesthesia is given to decrease pain perception during dental treatments, but it may itself be a reason for pain and aggravate the dental fear. Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLADS) is one of the alternatives for decreasing the patients’ pain during local anesthesia. This study compared the time required for the recovery from anesthesia, pain/discomfort during injection and pain/discomfort 24 hours after administering local anesthesia with CCLADS, a standard self-aspirating syringe and a conventional disposable 2-mL syringe. Methods. The study was conducted on 90 subjects (an age group of 20-40 years), who suffered from sensitivity during cavity preparation. They were randomly divided into three groups of 30 individuals each to receive intraligamentary anesthesia (2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline) using either of the three techniques: CCLADS, a standard self-aspirating syringe, or a conventional disposable 2-mL syringe. The onset of anesthesia, time required for recovery from anesthesia (in minutes), pain/discomfort during injection and pain/discomfort 24 hours after administering local anesthesia were recorded. Results. The time required for the onset of anesthesia and recovery from anesthesia was shorter with CCLADS (4.83±2.31 and 34.2±1.895, respectively) as compared to the standard self-aspirating group (10.83±1.90 and 43.5±7.581, respectively) and the conventional group (11.00±2.03 and 43.5±6.453, respectively) (P0.001). The patients in the CCLADS group experienced no pain during local anesthesia administration as compared to the patients in the self-aspirating and conventional groups. The CCLADS and self-aspirating groups showed lower pain response as compared to the conventional group for pain after 24 hours. Conclusion. CCLADS can be an effective and pain-free alternative to conventional local anesthetic procedures.
机译:背景。局部麻醉是为了减少牙科治疗过程中的疼痛感知,但它本身可能是痛苦的原因,加剧牙科恐惧。计算机控制的局部麻醉送货系统(CCLAD)是在局部麻醉期间降低患者疼痛的替代方案之一。本研究比较了在用CCLAD的局部麻醉后24小时内注射和疼痛/不适从麻醉,疼痛/不适所所需的时间,标准自吸入注射器和常规一次性2mL注射器。方法。该研究是在90名受试者(年龄组20年龄组)进行的,他在腔准备期间患有敏感性。将它们随机分为30组30个个体,每个人使用三种技术中任一种(标准的自吸注射器或传统的一次性2-ML注射器中的任一种,每组三组30个个体接受史内际麻醉(1:80,000肾上腺素)。麻醉发作,在记录局部麻醉后24小时内注射和疼痛/不适所需的麻醉(以分钟),疼痛/不适所需的时间。结果。与标准自吸网(分别为10.83±1.90和43.5±7.581±7.581),CCLAD(分别为4.83±2.31和34.2±1.895),麻醉发作和从麻醉中恢复的时间短。(分别为4.83±1.90和43.5±7.581)和常规组(分别为11.00±2.03和43.5±6.453)(P <0.001)。与自吸引和常规组的患者相比,CCLADS组中的患者在局部麻醉局期间没有疼痛。与常规组在24小时后疼痛相比,CCLAD和自吸群表现出较低的疼痛反应。结论。 CCLAD可以是常规局部麻醉程序的有效和无痛苦的替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号