...
首页> 外文期刊>JMLR: Workshop and Conference Proceedings >How Private Are Commonly-Used Voting Rules?
【24h】

How Private Are Commonly-Used Voting Rules?

机译:私人常用的投票规则是如何?

获取原文
           

摘要

Differential privacy has been widely applied to provide privacy guarantees by adding random noise to the function output. However, it inevitably fails in many high-stakes voting scenarios, where voting rules are required to be deterministic. In this work, we present the first framework for answering the question:“How private are commonly-used voting rules?" Our answers are two-fold. First, we show that deterministic voting rules provide sufficient privacy in the sense of distributional differential privacy (DDP). We show that assuming the adversarial observer has uncertainty about individual votes, even publishing the histogram of votes achieves good DDP. Second, we introduce the notion of exact privacy to compare the privacy preserved in various commonly-studied voting rules, and obtain dichotomy theorems of exact DDP within a large subset of voting rules called generalized scoring rules.
机译:差异隐私已被广泛应用于通过向功能输出增加随机噪声来提供隐私保障。然而,它不可避免地在许多高赌注投票方案中失败,其中投票规则是确定性的。在这项工作中,我们提出了回答问题的第一个框架:“私人常用的投票规则是如何私人的?”我们的答案是两倍。首先,我们表明确定性投票规则在分布差异隐私感提供足够的隐私(DDP)。假设对抗性观察者对个人票具有不确定性,甚至发布投票的直方图达到了良好的DDP。第二,我们介绍了精确隐私的概念,以比较各种常见的投票规则所保留的隐私,以及在称为广义评分规则的大型投票规则的大型子集中获得精确DDP的二分法定理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号