首页> 外文期刊>JMIR mHealth and uHealth >The Association Between App-Administered Depression Assessments and Suicidal Ideation in User Comments: Retrospective Observational Study
【24h】

The Association Between App-Administered Depression Assessments and Suicidal Ideation in User Comments: Retrospective Observational Study

机译:应用程序管理的抑郁评估和用户评论中的自杀意见之间的关联:回顾性观测研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Many people use apps to help understand and manage their depression symptoms. App-administered questionnaires for the symptoms of depression, such as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, are easy to score and implement in an app, but may not be accompanied by essential resources and access needed to provide proper support and avoid potential harm. Objective Our primary goal was to evaluate the differences in risks and helpfulness associated with using an app to self-diagnose depression, comparing assessment-only apps with multifeatured apps. We also investigated whether, what, and how additional app features may mitigate potential risks. Methods In this retrospective observational study, we identified apps in the Google Play store that provided a depression assessment as a feature and had at least five user comments. We separated apps into two categories based on those having only a depression assessment versus those that offered additional supportive features. We conducted theoretical thematic analyses over the user reviews, with thematic coding indicating the helpfulness of the app, the presence of suicidal ideation, and how and why the apps were used. We compared the results across the two categories of apps and analyzed the differences using chi-square statistical tests. Results We evaluated 6 apps; 3 provided only a depression assessment (assessment only), and 3 provided features in addition to self-assessment (multifeatured). User comments for assessment-only apps indicated significantly more suicidal ideation or self-harm (n=31, 9.4%) compared to comments for multifeatured apps (n=48, 2.3%; X sup2/supsub1/sub=43.88, P 2/supsub1/sub=200.36, P 2/supsub1/sub=189.09, P .001). Conclusions Apps that diagnose depression by self-assessment without context or other supportive features are more likely to be used by those under 18 years of age and more likely to be associated with increased user distress and potential harm. Depression self-assessments in apps should be implemented with caution and accompanied by evidence-based capabilities that establish proper context, increase self-empowerment, and encourage users to seek clinical diagnostics and outside help.
机译:背景,许多人使用应用来帮助理解和管理他们的抑郁症状。应用程序管理的抑郁症状问卷,例如患者健康问卷调查问卷-9,很容易在应用程序中进行得分和实施,但可能没有伴随基本资源和所需的访问,以提供适当的支持和避免潜在的伤害。目的我们的主要目标是评估与使用应用程序与自我诊断抑郁症相关的风险和助人的差异,比较与多辅应用的评估应用程序。我们还调查了额外的应用程序功能是否可以减轻潜在风险。方法在此回顾性观测研究中,我们在Google Play商店中确定了应用程序,该应用程序提供了作为特征的抑郁评估,并且至少有五个用户评论。我们将应用分为两类,基于只有抑郁评估与提供额外支持功能的抑郁评估的人分开。我们对用户评论进行了理论专题分析,主题编码指示应用程序的乐于助人,存在自杀性想象,以及应用程序的方式和原因。我们将结果与两种类别的应用程序进行了比较,并使用Chi-Square统计测试分析了差异。结果我们评估了6个应用程序; 3除了自我评估(多分析区)之外,仅提供了抑郁评估(仅限评估)和3个提供的功能。与多聚eatured应用的评论相比,仅评估应用程序的用户评论明显更多的自杀性想法或自我伤害(n = 31,9.4%)(n = 48,2.3%; x 2 1 = 43.88,p 2 1 = 200.36,p 2 1 = 189.09,p <.001)。结论在没有上下文或其他支持特征的情况下通过自我评估诊断抑郁或其他支持特征的应用更可能被18岁以下的人使用,并且更有可能与增加的用户痛苦和潜在伤害有关。应用中的抑郁症自我评估应当谨慎实施,并伴随着建立适当的上下文,增加自我赋权的基于证据的能力,并鼓励用户寻求临床诊断和外部帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号