首页> 外文期刊>Discrete dynamics in nature and society >Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Competing Retailers under Government Reward-Penalty Mechanism and Asymmetric Information
【24h】

Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Competing Retailers under Government Reward-Penalty Mechanism and Asymmetric Information

机译:政府奖励机制下竞争零售商闭环供应链研究及不对称信息

获取原文
           

摘要

In manufacturer-led closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) with two competing retailers, the retailer-1 recycles WEEE whose fixed recycling cost is asymmetric information. Using dynamics game theory and principal-agent theory, three dynamic game models are built including (1) benchmark model without reward-penalty mechanism (RPM); (2) decentralized model with carbon emission RPM; (3) decentralized model with carbon emission RPM and recovery rate RPM. This paper discusses the influence of RPM and retailers competition on the CLSC and members benefits. The results show that (1) the carbon emission RPM increases retail price, but decreases the WEEE recycling motivation usually. On the contrary, the recovery rate RPM guides WEEE recycling and lowers the retail price effectively. (2) In any case, the retailer-1’s profit is higher than that of the retailer-2; apparently it suggests that the retailer recycling WEEE gains competitive advantages. Furthermore, both the recovery rate RPM and retailers competition are beneficial to improve the competitive advantage. The relationship between two retailers’ retail price is affected by many complicated factors. (3) The WEEE buyback price and WEEE recovery rate with high fixed recycling cost (H-type) are always higher than that of low fixed recycling cost (L-type), respectively, which means that the H-type fixed recycling cost has scale advantages; the greater the reward-penalty intensity and the fiercer the competition, the more obvious the scale advantages under certain condition. (4) The retailers’ competition can not only guide WEEE recycling but also improve retailers’ profits. Meanwhile, the impact of competition on the manufacturer is related to RPM, but the fierce competition decreases the manufacturer’s profit.
机译:在制造商 - LED闭环供应链(CLSC)中,零售商-1返回WEEE,其固定回收成本是不对称信息。使用动力学博弈论和委托代理理论,建立了三种动态游戏模型,包括(1)基准模型而无需奖励罚金机制(RPM); (2)具有碳排放RPM的分散模型; (3)具有碳发射RPM和恢复率RPM的分散模型。本文讨论了转速和零售商竞争对CLSC和成员福利的影响。结果表明,(1)碳排放RPM增加零售价,但通常会降低WEEE回收动机。相反,恢复率转速指导WEEE回收并有效降低零售价格。 (2)无论如何,零售商-1的利润高于零售商-2;显然它表明零售商回收WEEE获得了竞争优势。此外,回收率转速和零售商竞争都有利于提高竞争优势。两种零售商零售价之间的关系受许多复杂因素的影响。 (3)具有高固定回收成本(H型)的WEEE回购价格和WEEE回收率分别高于低固定回收成本(L型),这意味着H型固定回收成本具有规模优势;奖励罚款强度和激烈的竞争越大,某些条件下的规模优势越明显。 (4)零售商的竞争不仅可以引导WEEE回收,还可以提高零售商的利润。与此同时,竞争对制造商的影响与RPM有关,但激烈的竞争会降低制造商的利润。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号