首页> 外文期刊>Disease markers >Early Discharge from the Emergency Department Based on Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) Levels: A TRIAGE III Substudy
【24h】

Early Discharge from the Emergency Department Based on Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) Levels: A TRIAGE III Substudy

机译:基于可溶性尿激酶纤溶酶原激活剂受体(SUPAR)水平的急诊部门的早期排出:分类III级数

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. Using biomarkers for early and accurate identification of patients at low risk of serious illness may improve the flow in the emergency department (ED) by classifying these patients as nonurgent or even suitable for discharge. A potential biomarker for this purpose is soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR). We hypothesized that availability of suPAR might lead to a higher proportion of early discharges. Design. A substudy of the interventional TRIAGE III trial, comparing patients with a valid suPAR measurement at admission to those without. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients discharged alive from the ED within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, readmissions, and mortality within 30 days. Setting. EDs at two university hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark. Participants. 16,801 acutely admitted patients were included. Measurements and Main Results. The suPAR level was available in 7,905 patients (suPAR group), but not in 8,896 (control group). The proportion of patients who were discharged within 24 hours of admittance was significantly higher in the suPAR group compared to the control group (50.2% (3,966 patients) vs. 48.6% (4,317 patients), P=0.04). Furthermore, the mean length of hospital stay in the suPAR group was significantly shorter compared to that in the control group (4.3 days (SD 7.4) vs. 4.6 days (SD 9.4), P=0.04). In contrast, the readmission rate within 30 days was significantly higher in the suPAR group (10.6% (839 patients) vs. 8.8% (785 patients), P0.001). Among patients discharged within 24 hours, there was no significant difference in the readmission rate or mortality within 30 days. Readmission occurred in 8.5% (336 patients) vs. 7.7% (331 patients) (P=0.18) and mortality in 1.3% (52 patients) vs. 1.8% (77 patients) (P=0.08) for the suPAR group and control group, respectively. Conclusion. These post hoc analyses demonstrate that the availability of the prognostic biomarker suPAR was associated with a higher proportion of discharge within 24 hours and reduced length of stay, but more readmissions. In patients discharged within 24 hours, there was no difference in readmission or mortality. Trial Registration of the Main Trial. This trial is registered with NCT02643459.
机译:客观的。利用生物标志物在严重疾病的低风险下提前准确地鉴定患者,可以通过将这些患者分类为非原因或甚至适合放电来改善急诊部门(ED)的流动。潜在的生物标志物为此目的是可溶性尿激酶纤溶酶原激活剂受体(SUPAR)。我们假设Supar的可用性可能导致更高比例的早期排放。设计。介入分类III试验的替换,比较患者在入院时对那些没有的患者。主要终点是在24小时内从ED排出的患者的比例。二次结果是住院住宿,入院和30天内死亡率的长度。环境。在丹麦首都地区的两个大学医院的EDS。参与者。包括16,801名急性录取的患者。测量和主要结果。 7,905名患者(SUPAR组)中有超级级别,但不在8,896(对照组)中。与对照组相比,Supar组在入场后24小时内排出的患者的比例(50.2%(3,966名患者)与48.6%(4,317名患者),P = 0.04)。此外,与对照组相比,Supar组的平均医院住院的平均长度明显缩短(4.3天(SD 7.4),4.6天(SD 9.4),P = 0.04)。相比之下,SUPAR组30天内的再入率率明显高(10.6%(839名患者)与8.8%(785名患者),P <0.001)。在24小时内排出的患者中,30天内的入伍率或死亡率没有显着差异。入院发生在8.5%(336名患者)和7.7%(331名患者)(P = 0.18)和1.3%(52名患者)的死亡率,对1.8%(77名患者)(P = 0.08)进行超支组和控制分别分别。结论。这些后的HOC分析表明,预后生物标志物SUPAR的可用性与24小时内的放电比例较高,并且保持时间减少,但更加入院。在24小时内出院的患者中,即入院或死亡率没有差异。审判主要审判的登记。此试验在NCT02643459中注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号