首页> 外文期刊>Healthcare >Getting “Unstuck”: A Multi-Site Evaluation of the Efficacy of an Interdisciplinary Pain Intervention Program for Chronic Low Back Pain
【24h】

Getting “Unstuck”: A Multi-Site Evaluation of the Efficacy of an Interdisciplinary Pain Intervention Program for Chronic Low Back Pain

机译:获得“unstuck”:一个多网站评估对跨性疼痛干预程序的慢性腰痛的功效

获取原文
       

摘要

Chronic low back pain is one of the major health problems in the U.S., resulting in a large number of years of disability. To address the biopsychosocial nature of pain, interdisciplinary pain programs provide integrated interventions by an interdisciplinary team in a unified setting with unified goals. This study examined outcomes of an interdisciplinary program located at two sites with different staff, yet with a unified model of treatment and documentation. Efficacy at the combined sites was examined by comparing standard measures obtained upon admission to the program with measures at completion of a 3–4 week long program for 393 patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Repeated measures included pain severity, pain interference, efficacy of self-management strategies, hours of activity, depression, ability to do ADLs, and physical endurance. All repeated measures differed at the p < 0.001 level, with large effect sizes (0.66–0.85). Eighty-two percent of graduates reported being “very much improved” or “much improved”. A second analyses provided evidence that treatment effects were robust across sites with no differences (<0.001) found on five of seven selected outcome measures. A third analysis found that number of days of treatment was correlated on three of seven measures at the <0.01 level. However, the amount of variance explained by days of treatment was under 5% on even the most highly correlated measure. These finding are consistent with previous research and explore short-term effectiveness of treatment across treatment sites and with variable duration of treatment.
机译:慢性低腰疼痛是美国的主要健康问题之一,导致持续多年的残疾。为了解决痛苦的生物心科学性质,跨学科疼痛计划通过统一目标的统一环境中的跨学科团队提供综合干预措施。本研究审查了位于不同员工的两个站点的跨学科计划的结果,但尚未统一的治疗和文件模型。通过比较在慢性低腰疼痛(CLBP)的393例患者的3-4周的措施时比较在计划中获得的标准措施进行比较了措施,对组合网站进行了疗效。重复措施包括疼痛严重程度,疼痛干扰,自我管理策略的疗效,活动时间,抑郁,做adls的能力,以及身体耐力。所有重复措施都在P <0.001级别不同,效果大小大(0.66-0.85)。八十二百年毕业生报告称“非常改善”或“大幅改善”。第二次分析提供了证据表明,在七种选定的结果措施中没有差异(<0.001),治疗效果在没有差异(<0.001)的情况下。第三分析发现,治疗的数天数在<0.01级的七个措施中相关。然而,即使是最高度相关的措施,仍有5%的治疗日期解释的差异量也未满5%。这些发现与先前的研究和探讨治疗部位的治疗短期有效性以及可变的治疗持续时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号