首页> 外文期刊>Health Research Policy and Systems >Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS): a knowledge transfer partnership
【24h】

Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS): a knowledge transfer partnership

机译:姑息治疗证据审查服务(步行者):知识转移伙伴关系

获取原文
           

摘要

The importance of linking evidence into practice and policy is recognised as a key pillar of a prudent approach to healthcare; it is of importance to healthcare professionals and decision-makers across the world in every speciality. However, rapid access to evidence to support service redesign, or to change practice at pace, is challenging. This is particularly so in smaller specialties such as Palliative Care, where pressured multidisciplinary clinicians lack time and skill sets to locate and appraise the literature relevant to a particular area. Therefore, we have initiated the Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS), a knowledge transfer partnership through which we have developed a clear methodology to conduct evidence reviews to support professionals and other decision-makers working in palliative care.PaCERS methodology utilises modified systematic review methods as there is no agreed definition or an accepted methodology for conducting rapid reviews. This paper describes the stages involved based on our iterative recent experiences and engagement with stakeholders, who are the potential beneficiaries of the research. Uniquely, we emphasise the process and opportunities of engagement with the clinical workforce and policy-makers throughout the review, from developing and refining the review question at the start through to the importance of demonstrating impact. We are faced with the challenge of the trade-off between the timely transfer of evidence against the risk of impacting on rigour. To address this issue, we try to ensure transparency throughout the review process. Our methodology aligns with key principles of knowledge synthesis in defining a process that is transparent, robust and improving the efficiency and timeliness of the review.Our reviews are clinically or policy driven and, although we use modified systematic review methods, one of the key differences between published review processes and our review process is in our relationship with the requester. This streamlining approach to synthesising evidence in a timely manner helps to inform decisions faced by clinicians and decision-makers in healthcare settings, supporting, at pace, knowledge transfer and mobilisation.
机译:将证据与实践和政策联系起来的重要性被认为是谨慎的医疗保健方式的关键支柱;在每个专业中对全世界的医疗保健专业人士和决策者都很重要。但是,快速获取证据支持服务重新设计,或以步伐改变练习,具有挑战性。这在较小的专业中如此较小的特色,如姑息治疗,其中压力的多学科临床医生缺乏时间和技能,以定位和评估与特定领域相关的文献。因此,我们已经开始了姑息治疗的证据审查服务(步行者),了解了一个知识转移伙伴关系,我们制定了一个明确的方法,以便为支持专业人士和在姑息管理工作中工作的专业人士和其他决策者进行证据审查.Pacers方法使用修改后系统审查方法没有商定的定义或接受的方法,用于进行快速评论。本文介绍了基于我们迭代最近经验和与利益相关者的参与的阶段,他是研究的潜在受益者。独特的,我们强调,在整个审查中强调与临床劳动力和政策制定者的婚姻劳动力和政策制定者的进程和机会,从制定和改进审查问题,以便对展示影响的重要性。我们面临着及时转移违反对严格的风险的权衡之间的权衡挑战。要解决此问题,我们会尝试在整个审查过程中确保透明度。我们的方法与知识综合的关键原则对齐,在定义透明,强大,提高评论的效率和及时性的过程中的关键原则。我们的评论是临床或政策驱动的,虽然我们使用修改系统审查方法,但其中一个关键差异之一在发布的审查流程和我们的审核过程中,我们与请求者的关系。这种简化的综合证据的方法及时综合证据有助于向临床医生和决策者面对的决策在医疗保健环境中,支持,以节奏,知识转移和动员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号