首页> 外文期刊>Health Research Policy and Systems >The potential role of cost-utility analysis in the decision to implement major system change in acute stroke services in metropolitan areas in England
【24h】

The potential role of cost-utility analysis in the decision to implement major system change in acute stroke services in metropolitan areas in England

机译:成本实用分析在决定中实施急性中风服务的重大体系变动潜在作用

获取原文
           

摘要

The economic implications of major system change are an important component of the decision to implement health service reconfigurations. Little is known about how best to report the results of economic evaluations of major system change to inform decision-makers. Reconfiguration of acute stroke care in two metropolitan areas in England, namely London and Greater Manchester (GM), was used to analyse the economic implications of two different implementation strategies for major system change. A decision analytic model was used to calculate difference-in-differences in costs and outcomes before and after the implementation of two major system change strategies in stroke care in London and GM. Values in the model were based on patient level data from Hospital Episode Statistics, linked mortality data from the Office of National Statistics and data from two national stroke audits. Results were presented as net monetary benefit (NMB) and using Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) to assess the costs and benefits of a hypothetical typical region in England with approximately 4000 strokes a year. In London, after 90 days, there were nine fewer deaths per 1000 patients compared to the rest of England (95% CI -24 to 6) at an additional cost of £770,027 per 1000 stroke patients admitted. There were two additional deaths (95% CI -19 to 23) in GM, with a total costs saving of £156,118 per 1000 patients compared to the rest of England. At a £30,000 willingness to pay the NMB was higher in London and GM than the rest of England over the same time period. The results of the PBMA suggest that a GM style reconfiguration could result in a total greater health benefit to a region. Implementation costs were £136 per patient in London and £75 in GM. The implementation of major system change in acute stroke care may result in a net health benefit to a region, even one functioning within a fixed budget. The choice of what model of stroke reconfiguration to implement may depend on the relative importance of clinical versus cost outcomes.
机译:主要系统变革的经济影响是实施卫生服务重建决定的重要组成部分。众所周知,如何最好地报告主要制度变更的经济评估结果,以通知决策者。在英格兰的两个大都市地区的急性中风护理重新配置,即伦敦和大曼彻斯特(GM),用于分析两种不同实施战略对主要系统变革的经济影响。决定分析模型用于计算在伦敦和通用汽车中风护理中实施两种主要系统变更策略之前和之后的成本和结果的差异。该模型中的价值基于医院讨论统计数据的患者水平数据,来自国家统计数据办公室的联系死亡率数据和来自两项国家中风审计的数据。结果呈现为净货币福利(NMB),并使用方案预算和边际分析(PBMA),以评估英格兰假设典型地区的成本和益处,每年大约4000次抚摸。在伦敦,90天后,每1000名患者的死亡人数减少了90岁的患者(95%CI -24至6),每1000名卒中患者额外收费为770,027岁。 GM有两种额外的死亡(95%CI -19至23),总成本为每1000名患者节省156,118英镑,而英格兰其他患者。在同一时间段内,以3万英镑的支付伦敦和通用汽车的支付速度更高。 PBMA的结果表明,GM风格重新配置可能导致对区域的总体健康效益。伦敦的实施成本为每位患者136英镑,通用汽车75英镑。急性冲程护理中主要系统变化的实施可能导致区域健康效益,甚至在固定预算范围内的一个运作。选择用于实施的冲程重新配置模型可能取决于临床与成本结果的相对重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号