首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Project management lessons learned from the multicentre CYCLE pilot randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Project management lessons learned from the multicentre CYCLE pilot randomized controlled trial

机译:项目管理经验教训从多中心周期试点随机对照试验中汲取

获取原文
           

摘要

Clinical trials management can be studied using project management theory. The CYCLE pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to determine the feasibility of a future rehabilitation trial of early in-bed cycling in the intensive care unit (ICU). In-bed cycling is a novel intervention, not typically available in ICUs. Implementation of this intervention requires personnel with specialized clinical expertise caring for critically ill patients and use of the in-bed cycle. Our objective was to describe the implementation and conduct of our pilot RCT using a project management approach. We retrospectively reviewed activities, timelines, and personnel involved in the trial. We organized activities into four project management phases: initiation, planning, execution, and monitoring and controlling. Data sources included Methods Centre documents used for trial coordination and conduct, and the trial data set. We report descriptive statistics as counts and proportions and also medians and quartiles, and we summarize the lessons learned. Seven ICUs in Canada participated in the trial. Time from research ethics board and contracts submission to first enrolment was a median (first quartile, third quartile) of 185 (146, 209) and 162 (114, 181) days, respectively. We trained 128 personnel on the CYCLE pilot RCT protocol, and 80 (63%) completed trial-related activities. Four sites required additional training after start-up due to staff turnover and leaves of absence. Over 15?months, we screened 864 patients: 256 were eligible and 66 were enrolled. Despite an 85% consent rate, 74% (190/256) of eligible patients were not randomized, largely (80% [152/190]) due to physiotherapist availability. Thirteen percent of recruitment weeks were lost due to physiotherapist staffing shortages. We highlight five key lessons learned: (1) prepare and anticipate site needs; (2) communicate regularly; (3) proactively analyse and act on process measure data; (4) develop contingency plans; (5) express appreciation to participating sites. Our analysis highlights the scope of relevant activities, rigorous training and monitoring, number and types of required personnel, and time required to conduct a multicentre ICU rehabilitation intervention trial. Our lessons learned can help others interested in implementing complex intervention trials, such as rehabilitation. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02377830 . Registered prospectively on 4 March 2015.
机译:可以使用项目管理理论研究临床试验管理。进行了循环试验随机对照试验(RCT),以确定重症监护单元(ICU)中未来床上循环的未来康复试验的可行性。床上循环是一种新颖的干预,通常不适用于ICU。实施本干预需要具有专业临床专业知识的人员,为危重病人提供关怀和使用床上循环。我们的目标是使用项目管理方法来描述我们的试点RCT的实施和进行。我们回顾性地审查了参与审判的活动,时间表和人员。我们将活动组织成四个项目管理阶段:启动,规划,执行和监控和控制。数据源包括用于试验协调和行为的方法中心文件以及试用数据集。我们将描述性统计数据报告为计数和比例以及中位数和四分位数,我们总结了学习的经验教训。加拿大七林伊斯透明情况参加了审判。从研究伦理委员会和合同提交第一次注册的时间是分别为185(146,209)和162(114,181)天的中位数(第一四分位数,第三个四分位数)。我们在循环飞行员RCT协议上培训了128名人员,80名(63%)完成的审判相关活动。由于员工营业额和缺席的叶子,启动后需要额外的培训。超过15?几个月,我们筛选了864名患者:256名符合条件,并注册了66名。尽管同意率为85%,但由于物理治疗师可用性,符合条件的患者的74%(190/256)符合条件的患者未随机化(80%[152/190])。由于物理治疗师的人员配置短缺,13%的招聘周损失。我们突出了五个关键的经验教训:(1)准备和预测网站需求; (2)定期沟通; (3)主动分析和行动过程测量数据; (4)制定应急计划; (5)对参与的网站表示赞赏。我们的分析强调了相关活动的范围,严格的培训和监测,所需人员的数量和类型以及进行多中心ICU康复干预审判所需的时间。我们的经验教训可以帮助别人有兴趣实施复杂的干预试验,例如康复。 ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02377830。已在2015年3月4日期前期注册。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号