...
首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy >Drug use and driving behaviors among drivers with and without alcohol-related infractions
【24h】

Drug use and driving behaviors among drivers with and without alcohol-related infractions

机译:有没有酒精相关违规的司机的药物使用和驾驶行为

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Brazil is one of the countries with the highest rates of alcohol-related traffic infractions, but little is known about the profile of the drivers who commit them. Identifying the characteristics of impaired drivers is essential for planning preventive actions. Objective To compare drug use and driving behavior profiles of drivers with and without alcohol-related infractions. Methods 178 drivers stopped at routine roadblocks were assessed by traffic agents who conducted standard roadblock procedures (document verification; request of a breathalyzer test [BT]). Drug use and driving behavior data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Subjects were divided into three groups: drivers who refused the BT (RDs, n = 72), drivers who tested positive on the BT (PDs, n = 34), and drivers who had committed other infractions (ODs, n = 72). Results The proportion of alcohol use in the last year was higher among RDs (100%) than in the PD and OD groups (97.1% and 72.2% respectively, p 0.001). Lifetime prevalence of cannabis and cocaine use for the overall sample was 44.3% and 18.2%, respectively. Fewer individuals in the OD group (31.5%) reported having been stopped at roadblocks in the previous year compared to the PDs (55.9%) and RDs (48.6%, p = 0.03). However, a higher proportion of RDs reported drunk driving in the same period (87.5%; PD 69.7%; OD 26.9%; p 0.001). Conclusion Essential differences among groups were observed. RDs had a higher proportion of alcohol use and drunk driving in the previous year; drivers who fit into this particular group may be unresponsive or less responsive to social deterrence and enforcement actions.
机译:简介巴西是与酒精有关的交通违规率最高的国家之一,但对提交的司机的档案知之甚少。识别障碍者的特征对于规划预防措施至关重要。目的比较司机的药物使用和驾驶行为概况,没有酗酒违规。方法通过进行标准障碍程序的交通代理(文献验证;呼吸检测[BT])的交通代理评估了178名驾驶员的驾驶员被评估通过半结构化访谈收集药物使用和驾驶行为数据。受试者分为三组:拒绝BT(RDS,N = 72)的司机,在BT(PDS,N = 34)和犯下其他违规行为的驱动程序(ODS,N = 72)上进行正面测试的驱动因素。结果RDS(100%)比Pd和OD组在RDS(100%)中的酒精使用比例较高(分别为97.1%和72.2%,P <0.001)。整体样品的大麻和可卡因使用的寿命分别为44.3%和18.2%。与PDS(55.9%)和RDS(48.6%,P = 0.03)相比,OD小组中的少数民会(31.5%)在上一年的路障中停止了较少。然而,较高比例的RDS报告在同一时期醉酒(87.5%; PD 69.7%; OD 26.9%; P <0.001)。结论观察到群体之间的基本差异。 RDS在去年的饮酒比例较高,醉酒驾驶更高;适合这一特定群体的司机可能对社会威慑和执法行为无响应或更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号