首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Safety Research >Distracting behaviors among teenagers and young, middle-aged, and older adult drivers when driving without and with warnings from an integrated vehicle safety system
【24h】

Distracting behaviors among teenagers and young, middle-aged, and older adult drivers when driving without and with warnings from an integrated vehicle safety system

机译:在没有或没有集成车辆安全系统警告的情况下驾驶时,分散青少年和中青年驾驶员的行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Negative reinforcement from crash warnings may reduce the likelihood that drivers engage in distracted driving. Alternatively, drivers may compensate for the perceived safety benefit of crash warnings by engaging in distractions more frequently, especially at higher speeds. The purpose of this study was to examine whether warning feedback from an integrated vehicle-based safety system affected the likelihood that various secondary behaviors were present among drivers ages 16-17, 20-30, 40-50, and 60-70. Method: Participants drove an instrumented sedan with various collision warning systems for an extended period. Ten 5-second video clips were randomly sampled from driving periods at speeds above 25 mph and below 5 mph each week for each driver and coded for the presence of 11 secondary behaviors. Results: At least one secondary behavior was present in 46% of video clips; conversing with a passenger (17%), personal grooming (9%), and cellphone conversation (6%) were the most common. The likelihood that at least one secondary behavior was present was not significantly different during periods when drivers received warnings relative to periods without warnings. At least one secondary behavior was 21% more likely to be present at speeds below 5 mph relative to speeds above 25 mph; however, the effect of vehicle speed was not significantly affected by warning presence. Separate models for each of the five most common secondary behaviors also indicated that warnings had no significant effect on the likelihood that each behavior was present. Conclusions: Collision warnings were not associated with significant increases or decreases in the overall likelihood that teen and adult drivers engaged in secondary behaviors or the likelihood of the behaviors at speeds above 25 mph or below 5 mph. Practical applications: There was no evidence that forward collision warning and other technologies like those in this study will increase or decrease distracted driving. (C) 2017 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:简介:碰撞警告对驾驶员的负面影响可能会降低驾驶员分心驾驶的可能性。可替代地,驾驶员可以通过更频繁地分心,尤其是在较高速度下,分心来补偿碰撞警告的感知安全益处。这项研究的目的是检查来自基于集成车辆的安全系统的警告反馈是否影响16-17、20-30、40-50和60-70岁驾驶员出现各种次要行为的可能性。方法:参与者长时间驾驶装有各种碰撞预警系统的仪表板轿车。从每个驾驶人每周以超过25 mph和低于5 mph的速度从驾驶期间随机抽取十个5秒的视频剪辑,并对11种次要行为进行编码。结果:46%的视频剪辑中至少存在一种次要行为;与乘客交谈(17%),个人美容(9%)和手机通话(6%)是最常见的方式。相对于没有警告的时间段,在驾驶员收到警告的时间段内,至少存在一种次要行为的可能性没有显着差异。与低于25 mph的速度相比,低于5 mph的速度存在至少一种次要行为的可能性高21%。但是,警告的出现并没有显着影响车速的影响。五个最常见的次要行为中的每个行为都有单独的模型,还表明,警告对每种行为的可能性均无重大影响。结论:碰撞警告与青少年和成年驾驶员从事次要行为的总体可能性或以高于25 mph或低于5 mph的速度行事的可能性的显着增加或减少无关。实际应用:没有证据表明前向碰撞警告和本研究中的其他技术会增加或减少分心驾驶。 (C)2017国家安全委员会和Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号