首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology. >Outcomes of esophagectomy after noncurative endoscopic resection of early esophageal cancer
【24h】

Outcomes of esophagectomy after noncurative endoscopic resection of early esophageal cancer

机译:非耐久性内镜切除早期食管癌后食道切除术的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Current guidelines recommend performing esophagectomy after endoscopic resection for early esophageal cancer when the risk of lymph node metastasis or residual cancer is found to be significant and endoscopic treatment is therefore noncurative. Our aim was to assess the safety and oncological outcomes of esophagogastric resection in this specific clinical setting. Patients and methods: A retrospective review from 2012 to 2018 was performed at four tertiary referral centers. All patients had a noncurative endoscopic resection of a clinical T1 esophageal cancer, followed by esophagectomy. Outcome measures were the rates of T0N0 specimens, overall survival, disease-free and cancer-specific survival, postoperative morbidity and mortality. Results: A total of 30 patients (13 with squamous cell carcinoma and 17 with adenocarcinoma) were included. The reasons for noncurative endoscopic resection were: positive vertical margins ( n?=?12), squamous cell carcinoma with muscularis mucosae or submucosal layer invasion ( n?=?3 and 9), adenocarcinoma with deep submucosal invasion ( n?=?11), poorly differentiated tumor ( n?=?6) and lymphovascular invasion ( n?=?6). Overall, 63% of the esophagi were T0N0: most residual lesions were T1a metachronous lesions, and four (13%) patients had advanced pT status ( n?=?3) or lymph node metastases ( n?=?2). Overall survival, disease-free survival and cancer-specific survival were 83%, 75%, and 90% respectively. A total of 43% of patients had severe postoperative complications, and postoperative mortality was 7%. Conclusion: In this cohort, esophagectomy allowed the resection of residual advanced cancer or lymph node metastases in 13% of cases, at the cost of 43% severe morbidity and 7% mortality. Therefore, the possibility of close follow up needs to be balanced with a highly morbid surgical management in these patients.
机译:背景:当前指南建议在未发现淋巴结转移或残留癌症的风险时,在内镜切除后进行食管切除术后进行食管癌,因此是非刺激的。我们的目的是评估这种特定临床环境中食管胃切除的安全性和肿瘤治疗结果。患者和方法:2012年至2018年的回顾性审查是在四个三级推荐中心进行的。所有患者患有临床T1食管癌的非耐久性内窥镜切除,其次是食管切除术。结果措施是T0N0标本,整体生存,无病和癌症的存活率,术后发病率和死亡率。结果:共有30名患者(13名患有鳞状细胞癌和17名腺癌)。非耐受内镜切除术的原因是:阳性垂直边缘(n?=β12),鳞状细胞癌或粘膜层侵袭(n?= 3和9),具有深度粘膜侵袭的腺癌(n?=?11 ),肿瘤不良(n?=Δ6)和淋巴血管侵袭(n?=?6)。总体而言,63%的食道均为T0N0:大多数残留病变是T1A相位病变,四个(13%)患者具有晚期PT状态(N?= 3)或淋巴结转移(n?=?2)。总生存率,无病生存和癌症特异性生存率分别为83%,75%和90%。共有43%的患者术后并发症严重,术后死亡率为7%。结论:在该队列中,食道切除术允许在13%的病例中切除残留的晚期癌症或淋巴结转移,其成本严重发病率43%和7%死亡率。因此,在这些患者的高度病态外科手术管理中需要平衡紧密跟进的可能性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号