...
首页> 外文期刊>Thoracic cancer. >Growth of thymic epithelial tumors and thymic cysts: Differential radiological points
【24h】

Growth of thymic epithelial tumors and thymic cysts: Differential radiological points

机译:胸腺上皮肿瘤和胸腺囊肿的生长:差动放射点

获取原文

摘要

The growth rate of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) and thymic cysts was investigated to determine whether they can be differentiated and clinico-radiological predictors of interval growth was identified. This retrospective study included 122 patients with pathologically proven thymic cysts (n?=?56) or TETs (n?=?66) who underwent two serial chest computed tomography scans at least eight?weeks apart. Average diameters and attenuation were measured, volume-doubling times (VDTs) were calculated, and clinical characteristics were recorded. VDTs were compared using the log-rank test. Predictors of growth were analyzed using the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. The frequency of growth did not differ significantly between TETs and thymic cysts (P?=?0.279). The VDT of thymic cysts (median 324?days) was not significantly different from that of the TETs (median 475?days; P?=?0.808). Water attenuation (≤ 20 Hounsfield units) predicted growth in thymic cysts (P?=?0.016; hazard ratio 13.2, 95% confidence interval 1.6-107.3), while lesion size ( 17.2 mm) predicted growth in TETs (P?=?0.008 for size, P?=?0.029 for size*time). For the growing lesions, the positive and negative predictive values of water attenuation for thymic cysts were 93% and 80%, respectively. The frequencies of interval growth and VDTs were indistinguishable between TETs and thymic cysts. Water attenuation and lesion size predicted growth in thymic cysts and TETs, respectively. Among the growing lesions, water attenuation was a differential feature of thymic cysts. ? 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
机译:研究了胸腺上皮肿瘤(TETS)和胸腺囊肿的生长速率,以确定它们是否可以分化,并且鉴定了间隔生长的临床放射预测因子。该回顾性研究包括122例病理证明胸腺囊肿(n?=Δ56)或Tets(n?=Δ66),他们接受了两个串行胸部计算机断层扫描扫描至少八周的时间。测量平均直径和衰减,计算体积倍增时间(VDT),并记录临床特征。使用日志排名测试进行比较VDT。使用日志秩检验和COX回归分析分析了增长的预测因素。在TETS和胸腺囊肿之间的生长频率没有显着差异(P?= 0.279)。胸腺囊肿的VDT(中位数324?天)与TETS的VDT没有显着差别(中位数475?天; P?= 0.808)。水衰减(≤20Hounsfield单位)预测胸腺囊肿的生长(p?= 0.016;危险比13.2,95%置信区间1.6-107.3),而病变尺寸(> 17.2mm)预测TETS的生长(P?=? 0.008尺寸,p?= 0.029尺寸*时间)。对于越来越大的病变,胸腺囊肿水衰减的正和负预测值分别为93%和80%。间隔生长和VDT的频率在TETS和胸腺囊肿之间无法区分。水衰减和病变大小分别预测胸腺囊肿和滴滴的生长。在不断增长的病变中,水衰减是胸腺囊肿的差异特征。 ? 2019年的作者。中国肺部肿瘤集团和约翰瓦里和儿子澳大利亚发表的胸癌

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号