...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain research & management: the journal of the Canadian Pain Society = journal de la socie?te? canadienne pour le traitement de la douleur >How to Choose Platelet-Rich Plasma or Hyaluronic Acid for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis in Overweight or Obese Patients: A Meta-Analysis
【24h】

How to Choose Platelet-Rich Plasma or Hyaluronic Acid for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis in Overweight or Obese Patients: A Meta-Analysis

机译:如何选择富含血小板血浆或透明质酸,用于治疗超重或肥胖患者的膝关节骨关节炎:荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective . The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was better than hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in overweight or obese patients. Design . Two reviewers independently used the keywords combined with free words to search English-based electronic databases according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines, such as PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane library. The pooled data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3. Results . Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1096 patients were included. During the first two months of follow-up, there was no significant difference between the two groups. At the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months of follow-up, the pooled analysis showed that PRP was better than HA for the treatment of knee OA in overweight or obese patients. There were significant differences between the two groups at Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score (3 months: MD?=??1.35, [95% CI: ?2.19 to ?0.50], P = 0.002 , I sup2/sup =?0%; 6 months: MD?=??7.62, [95% CI: ?13.51 to ?1.72], P = 0.01 , I sup2/sup =?88%; 12 months: MD?=??12.11, [95% CI: ?20.21 to ?4.01], P = 0.003 , I sup2/sup =?94%). Conclusions . For overweight or obese patients with knee OA, intra-articular injection of PRP in a short time was not necessarily superior to HA, but long-term use was better than HA in pain and functional relief.
机译:客观的 。该荟萃分析的目的是确定富含血小板的血浆(PRP)是否优于透明质酸(HA),用于治疗超重或肥胖患者的膝关节骨关节炎(OA)。设计 。两位审阅者独立使用关键字与免费单词相结合,以根据Cochrane协作指南搜索以英语为基础的电子数据库,例如PubMed,Embase,ScieCentirect和Cochrane图书馆。使用Revman 5.3分析汇总数据。结果 。包括10例随机对照试验(RCT),包括1096名患者。在后续的前两个月,两组之间没有显着差异。在3次,第6个和第12个月的随访中,汇总的分析表明,PRP优于HA,用于治疗超重或肥胖患者的膝关节OA。西部的安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOWAC)总分之间存在显着差异(3个月:MD?= ?? 1.35,[95%CI:21.19至0.50],P = 0.002,I < sup> 2 =?0%; 6个月:md?= ?? 7.62,[95%ci:13.51至Δ1.72],p = 0.01,i 2 =?88 %; 12个月:md?= ?? 12.11,[95%ci:η21至α.4.01],p = 0.003,i 2 =?94%)。结论。对于膝关节OA的超重或肥胖患者,在短时间内,关节内注射PRP并不一定优于HA,但长期使用在疼痛和功能浮雕中优于HA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号