首页> 外文期刊>Syiar Hukum >PENERAPAN SISTEM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA BAGI LEMBAGA PERBANKAN DITINJAU DARI TEORI-TEORI SISTEM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI
【24h】

PENERAPAN SISTEM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA BAGI LEMBAGA PERBANKAN DITINJAU DARI TEORI-TEORI SISTEM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI

机译:银行机构刑事责任制度在企业刑事责头制度理论方面的应用

获取原文
       

摘要

The economy of the modern society is closely related or even inseparable with the world of banking. It is due to the fact that the main function of banking institutions is basically as an intermediary. However, the fact that the existence of banking institutions is as a corporation does not always have a positive impact. It can also impact negatively in the sense that the banking institution as a corporation becomes a perpetrator of criminal acts or conducts various criminal acts harmful to the public but untouchable by law. The results show that banking institutions (banks) can be categorized as corporations according to the criminal law. Consequently, as a legal subject, the bank is supposedly liable to commit a criminal offense and may be held accountable for criminal acts. The corporate criminal liability system has been legitimized and justified by several doctrines or theories: identification theory, strict liability theory, vicarious liability doctrine, the corporate culture model or company culture theory, doctrine of aggregation, and reactive corporate fault. If it is related to the subject matter, the corporate criminal liability system, as legitimized and justified by the various theories, can be applied to banking institutions. Hence, according to such theories or doctrines, the bank is deemed able to commit criminal acts and bear criminal liability. In addition, the arrangement and application of corporate criminal liability systems for banking institutions may also be justified by several fundamental or principal reasons. However, it is unfortunate that the system of criminal liability for banking institutions as a corporation is not yet applicable. This is because the current banking law is still dominated by the principle of "societas delinquere non potest" and collided with the principle of legality in criminal law. Thus, to overcome various problems that may arise in the future, the banking law needs to be revised by taking into account several things as described further in this paper. ?
机译:现代社会的经济密切相关,甚至与银行业的世界密不可分。这是由于银行机构的主要功能基本上是中间人。然而,银行机构存在的事实是公司并不总是产生积极的影响。它对银行机构作为公司的意义上也会产生负面影响,因为公司成为犯罪行为的肇事者,或者对公众有害的犯罪行为,但不可触碰的法律。结果表明,银行机构(银行)可根据刑法作为企业分类。因此,作为一个法律主题,本行据说责任犯下刑事犯罪,并可持刑事行为负责。公司刑事责任制度由几个教义或理论合法化和合理:识别理论,严格的责任理论,替代责任主义,企业文化模型或公司文化理论,聚集学说和反应性企业故障。如果它与主题有关,则以各种理论合法化和合理的公司刑事责任制度可以应用于银行机构。因此,根据这样的理论或教义,银行被认为能够犯下犯罪行为和承担刑事责任。此外,银行机构的企业刑事责任系统的安排和应用也可以通过几个基本或主要原因合理。但是,不幸的是,作为公司作为公司银行机构的刑事责任制度尚未适用。这是因为目前的银行法仍然是“苏联德军非竞技场”的原则主导,并与刑法中的合法性原则相撞。因此,为了克服将来可能出现的各种问题,需要通过考虑本文进一步描述的几件事来修订银行法。 ?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号