首页> 外文期刊>Stem Cell Research & Therapy >Comparative separation methods and biological characteristics of human placental and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in serum-free culture conditions
【24h】

Comparative separation methods and biological characteristics of human placental and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in serum-free culture conditions

机译:无血清培养条件下人胎盘和脐带间充质干细胞的比较分离方法和生物学特性

获取原文
           

摘要

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are considered to be an effective tool for regenerative medicine with promising applications for clinical therapy. However, incongruent data has been reported partially owing to their functional heterogeneity. To provide sufficient and suitable clinical seed cells derived from the placenta for MSC therapy, we compared the various current isolation methods, as well as the biological characteristics, of different human placenta mesenchymal stem cells (hPMSCs). We selected placentas from 35 informed donors and exploited three commonly used methods. MSCs were isolated from different parts of placental tissue including umbilical cord (UC), amniotic membrane (AM), chorionic membrane (CM), chorionic villi (CV), and deciduae (DC). The appropriate isolation methods for each type of hPMSCs were first assessed. The resulting five MSC types from the same individuals were identified based on their surface marker expression, proliferation capacity, transcriptome, differentiation, multipotency and karyotype. All three methods successfully isolated the five hPMSC types from placental tissues. However, the UC-MSCs were most effectively separated via the tissue explant method, while the enzymatic digestion method was found to be more suitable for separating CV-MSCs, owing to its higher output efficiency compared to the other methods. Alternatively, the perfusion method was complicated and exhibited the lowest efficiency for cell isolation and uniformity. Furthermore, we determined that UC-MSCs and CV-MSCs express a higher level of paracrine cytokines and display much stronger proliferative capacity as well as superior extraction efficiency. Finally, karyotype analysis revealed that DC-MSCs are derived from the mother, while the other cell types are derived from the fetus. Moreover, the different hPMSCs exhibited unique gene expression profiles, which may prove advantageous in treatment of a broad range of diseases. hPMSCs from different sources are similar yet also unique. Our results describe the biological characteristics of five hPMSCs and provide insights to aide in the selection process of candidates for MSCs treatment. Overall, UC- and CV-MSCs appear to be ideal sources of primary MSCs for clinical treatment and future research.
机译:间充质干细胞(MSCs)被认为是再生医学的有效工具,具有临床治疗的有希望的应用。然而,由于其功能异质性,部分地报告了不一致的数据。为了提供源自胎盘的足够和合适的临床种子细胞进行MSC治疗,我们将各种电流分离方法以及不同人胎盘间充质干细胞(HPMSC)的生物学特性进行了比较。我们选择了35名知情捐助者的胎盘,并利用了三种常用的方法。 MSCs与胎盘组织的不同部位分离,包括脐带(UC),羊膜(AM),绒毛膜膜(CM),绒毛膜绒毛(CV)和DeCiduae(DC)。首先评估每种类型HPMSCs的适当分离方法。基于它们的表面标记表达,增殖能力,转录组,分化,多功能和核型,鉴定来自相同个体的5种MSC类型。所有三种方法从胎盘组织成功孤立五种HPMSC类型。然而,UC-MSCs最有效地通过组织外部化方法分离,而发现酶消化方法更适合于分离CV-MSCs,由于其与其他方法相比的较高的输出效率。或者,灌注方法复杂,并且表现出用于细胞分离和均匀性的最低效率。此外,我们确定UC-MSCs和CV-MSCs表达更高水平的旁静脉细胞因子,并显示出更强烈的增殖能力以及优异的提取效率。最后,核型分析显示,DC-MSCs来自母亲,而其他小区类型源自胎儿。此外,不同的HPMSCs表现出独特的基因表达谱,这可能证明有利于治疗广泛的疾病。来自不同来源的HPMSCS也是类似的。我们的结果描述了五个HPMSC的生物学特性,并为MSCS治疗候选人的选择过程提供了对助手的见解。总体而言,UC和CV-MSCS似乎是临床治疗和未来研究的主要MSC的理想来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号