...
首页> 外文期刊>Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia >Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional palpatory method of dorsalis pedis artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus conventional palpatory method of dorsalis pedis artery cannulation: A randomized controlled trial

机译:超声引导与常规触发方法的多变瓣动脉插管的比较:随机对照试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Whether use of ultrasound (USG) to cannulate dorsalis pedis artery (DPA) increases first pass successful cannulation, decreases the number of attempts and complications as compared to palpation technique was assessed in this study. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Operating room. Patients: About 60 adult patients undergoing any head–neck or faciomaxillary surgery requiring arterial cannulation were enrolled. Intervention: DPA was cannulated either by USG-guided technique (USG group) or by palpation technique (palpation group) with 30 patients in each group. Measurement: Data were assessed for “first-attempt success” of cannulation, number of attempts, assessment time, cannulation time, cannulation failure, and incidence of complications. Main Results: Successful first pass DPA cannulation was similar between the groups (ultrasound group vs. palpation group, 76.7% vs. 60%, respectively) [relative risk (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.69 (0.43, 1.13), P = 0.267)] as was the number of attempts required for successful cannulation [median (interquartile range (IQR) number of attempts 1 (1–2) in palpation group P and USG group U 1 (1–1); P = 0.376]. Median (IQR) assessment time was significantly less ( P 0.0004) in palpation group [palpation group 12 (9–17) vs. USG group U 19 (15–21)]. However, cannulation time was significantly higher ( P = 0.0093) in Group P [median (IQR) 17.5 (12–36 s) and 11.5 (9–15)]. Although the total procedure time (sum of both assessment time and cannulation time) remain statistically similar between two groups ( P = 0.8882). Conclusions: Use of USG for the cannulation of DPA is feasible, but it is not associated with significant increase in first-attempt success rate, decrease in total number of cannulation attempts or total procedure time.
机译:背景技术:无论是使用超声(USG)到插管Dorsalis Pedis动脉(DPA)都会增加首次通过成功的插管,在本研究中评估了与触诊技术相比,降低了尝试和并发症的次数。设计:随机对照试验。设置:手术室。患者:约有60名成年患者接受任何需要动脉插管的头颈或面影手术。干预:DPA通过USG导向技术(USG组)或通过每组30名患者的触诊技术(触诊组)插管。测量:评估数据的“首次尝试成功”,尝试的次数,评估时间,插管时间,插管衰竭和并发症发生率。主要结果:成功的第一次通过DPA插管在群体之间相似(超声组与触诊组,76.7%,分别为76.7%,分别为60%)[相对风险(95%置信区间(CI)= 0.69(0.43,1.13),p = 0.267)]作为成功插管所需的尝试数[中位数(IQRILE范围(IQR)触诊组中的尝试1(1-2),P和USG组U 1(1-1); P = 0.376] 。触诊组中的中位数(IQR)评估时间(P <0.0004)在触诊组中[触诊组12(9-17)与USG组U 19(15-21)]。但是,插管时间明显高(P = 0.0093)在P [中位数(IQR)17.5(12-36秒)和11.5(9-15)]中。虽然总程序时间(评估时间和插管时间的总和)在两组之间保持统计学相似(P = 0.8882)。结论:使用USG对DPA的插管是可行的,但它与第一​​次尝试成功率的显着增加无关,总数减少插管尝试或总程序时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号