首页> 外文期刊>Science Advances >When policy and psychology meet: Mitigating the consequences of bias in schools
【24h】

When policy and psychology meet: Mitigating the consequences of bias in schools

机译:当政策和心理学相遇时:减轻学校偏见的后果

获取原文
           

摘要

Harsh exclusionary discipline predicts major negative life outcomes, including adult incarceration and unemployment. This breeds racial inequality because Black students are disproportionately at risk for this type of discipline. Can a combination of policy and psychological interventions reduce this kind of discipline and mitigate this inequality? Two preregistered experiments ( N subexperiment1/sub = 246 teachers; N subexperiment2/sub = 243 teachers) used an established paradigm to systematically test integration of two and then three policy and psychological interventions to mitigate the consequences of bias (troublemaker labeling and pattern perception) on discipline (discipline severity). Results indicate that the integrated interventions can curb teachers’ troublemaker labeling and pattern prediction toward Black students who misbehave in a hypothetical paradigm. In turn, integration of the three components reduced racial inequality in teachers’ discipline decisions. This research informs scientific theory, public policy, and interventions.
机译:苛刻的排他学学科预测了主要的负面生活结果,包括成人监禁和失业。这滋生了种族不平等,因为黑人学生对这种类型的纪律风险不成比例。政策和心理干预可以结合这种纪律并减轻这种不平等吗?两个预期的实验(n 实验1 = 246教师; n 实验2 = 243教师)使用了建立的范例来系统地测试两种,然后是三个政策和心理干预的整合来减轻偏见(麻烦制造标签和模式感知)对纪律(纪律严重性)的后果。结果表明,综合干预措施可以将教师的麻烦制造者标记和模式预测遏制在假设范式中不行使的黑人学生。反过来,三个组件的整合减少了教师纪律决策中的种族不等式。本研究通知科学理论,公共政策和干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号