...
首页> 外文期刊>Sarcoma >Angiosarcoma of the Scalp and Face: A Dosimetric Comparison of HDR Surface Applicator Brachytherapy and VMAT
【24h】

Angiosarcoma of the Scalp and Face: A Dosimetric Comparison of HDR Surface Applicator Brachytherapy and VMAT

机译:头皮和面部的angiosarcoma:HDR表面涂抹器近距离放射治疗和VMAT的剂量比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose. Angiosarcoma of the face and scalp is a rare disease with high rates of recurrence. The optimal treatment approach is not well defined. This study presents a dosimetric comparison of high-dose-rate surface applicator (HDR-SA) brachytherapy to volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods. Between 2011 and 2018, 12 patients with primary or recurrent angiosarcoma of the face or scalp were treated with HDR-SA brachytherapy using CT-based planning at our institution. For comparison, deliverable VMAT plans for each patient were generated, and dose distribution was compared to the delivered HDR-SA brachytherapy plans. Results. Both VMAT and HDR-SA brachytherapy plans delivered good coverage of the clinical target. However, the dose distribution of VMAT was significantly different from HDR-SA brachytherapy across a variety of parameters. Mean doses to the lacrimal gland, orbit, lens, and cochlea were significantly higher with HDR-SA brachytherapy vs. VMAT. Brain Dmax, V80%, and V50% were also significantly higher with HDR-SA brachytherapy. Conclusions. There may be dosimetric advantages to VMAT over HDR-SA brachytherapy for many patients. However, individual tumor location, patient anatomy, and treatment reproducibility may result in HDR-SA brachytherapy being the preferred technique in a subset of patients. Ultimately, a personalized approach is likely to be the optimal treatment plan.
机译:目的。脸部和头皮的昂贵arcoma是一种罕见的疾病,具有高的复发率。最佳治疗方法没有明确定义。本研究提出了高剂量速率表面涂抹器(HDR-SA)近距离放射治疗到体积调制的电弧治疗(VMAT)的剂量比较。方法。 2011年和2018年间,使用CT基于CT的规划,使用CT-SA近距离放射治疗治疗12次患有脸部或头皮的初级或复发性患者的患者。为了比较,产生每位患者的可交付VMAT计划,并将剂量分布与递送的HDR-SA近距离放射治疗计划进行比较。结果。 VMAT和HDR-SA近距离放疗计划均提供良好的临床目标覆盖。然而,VMAT的剂量分布与各种参数的HDR-SA近距离放射治疗显着不同。平均剂量与泪腺,轨道,透镜和耳蜗的剂量显着较高,HDR-SA近距离放射治疗与VMAT显着更高。随着HDR-SA近距离放射治疗,脑DMAX,V80%和V50%也显着高。结论。对于许多患者的HDR-SA近距离放射治疗,可能会有剂量测定优势。然而,个体肿瘤位置,患者解剖和治疗重现可能导致HDR-SA近距离放射治疗是患者子集中的优选技术。最终,个性化方法可能是最佳的治疗计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号