...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >BORDERLINE DYSPLASIA: ARE THESE HIPS ONLY MILDLY UNCOVERED?
【24h】

BORDERLINE DYSPLASIA: ARE THESE HIPS ONLY MILDLY UNCOVERED?

机译:边缘发育不良:这些臀部是否只有温和地发现?

获取原文

摘要

Background: Controversy surrounds classification and treatment of hips with a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) between 18° and 25°. It remains undetermined as to whether open or arthroscopic procedures are best used to treat patients with borderline dysplasia. We hypothesized that patients with hip pain and borderline acetabular dysplasia have different features of acetabular morphology as determined by other relevant radiographic measures beyond the LCEA. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing hip preservation surgery between January 2010 and December 2015 with either periacetabular osteotomy(PAO) or hip arthroscopy with a LCEA between 18° and 25° was performed. Anteroposterior, Dunn lateral and false profile radiographs were used to measure LCEA, T?nnis Angle, anterior center edge angle (ACEA), anterior (AWI) and posterior (PWI) wall indexes, the femoral epiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index, joint space width, crossover sign, posterior wall sign, P/A index, and femoral alpha angle. An agglomerative hierarchical clustering analysis was then performed on the continuous radiographic variables to identify different subtypes of hip pathomorphology among this patient cohort. There were sex-specific trends in hip morphology. Therefore, we proceeded to perform separate cluster analyses for each sex. Results: Ninety-nine patients underwent surgery in the study period, 77 (78%) were female, and 81 (82%) of these had complete radiographic images for cluster analysis. Mean age was 22.6 years. Hip arthroscopy was performed in 41% of patients and periacetabular osteotomy was performed in 59% of patients. The ACEA (45%), FEAR Index (34%), and AWI (30%) were the most commonly abnormal radiographic parameters among all patients. In female patients, the ACEA (55%), FEAR Index (42%), and AWI (34%) were the most commonly abnormal radiographic parameters. In male patients, an insufficient PWI (48%) was the most common radiographic abnormality. For females, we identified three clusters representing different patterns of hip morphology: impingement morphology; lateral acetabular deficiency, and anterolateral acetabular deficiency (Table 1A). For males, we identified three clusters: postero-lateral acetabular deficiency with global cam morphology, postero-lateral acetabular deficiency with focal cam morphology, and lateral acetabular deficiency without cam morphology (Table 1B). Conclusions: A comprehensive evaluation of radiographic parameters in patients with LCEA 18-25° identifies sex-specific trends in hip morphology and shows a large proportion of dysplastic features among these patients. A thorough evaluation of all pelvic morphology, not just lateral coverage, should be considered when indicating these patients for hip preservation surgeries. Further studies are needed to investigate the outcomes of patients within each of the identified clusters to determine optimal treatment options for each group. Table 1A. Female Clusters of Hip Morphology FEMALE PATIENTS Dunm. Alpha Angle AP Alpha Angle FNSA Tommis Angle ACEA AWI PWI AP Index FEAR Index Impingement MarphologyN–10 62.4 68 134 11.6 18.2 0.36 0.95 2.4 -2.5 [46.7 - 84.6] [50.4 - 90.9] [125.2 - 150.5] [4.2 - 19.1] [6.3 - 34.6] [0.15 - 0.56] [0.82 - 1.15] [1.4 - 4.3] [-17 - 11] Lateral Acetabular DefIeiencyN–16 54.6 41 133.3 3.9 25.4 0.5 0.87 1.7 -9.3 [32.9 - 72.2] [35.7 - 49.6] [125.8 - 141.1] [-3.3 - 110.4] [14.4 - 37.4] [0.23 - 0.69] [0.70 - 1.11] [1.1 - 2.7] [-26 - 7] Anterolateral Acetabular DeficiencyN–35 44 38.7 138.7 12.2 14.6 0.32 0.93 2.7 6.7 [34.1 - 51.4] [30.2 - 46] [128.5 - 148.6] [-3.2 - 19.8] [5.2 - 27.6] [0.08 - 0.59] [0.33 - 1.24] [1.4 - 5.0] [-4 - 17] Table 1B. Male Clusters of Hip Morphology MALE PATIENTS Dunm. Alpha Angle AP Alpha Angle FNSA Tommis Angle ACEA AWI PWI AP Index FEAR Index GLOBAL CAM. MORPHOLOGY + PL DEFICIENCYN–7 69.7 76.5 129.3 5.6 25.4 0.39 0.77 1.6 -8.7 [56.3 - 84.0] [64 - 97.7] [120.2 - 134.7] [3.0 - 12.2] [14.9 - 32.1] [0.25 - 0.50] [0.63 - 0.95] [1.3 - 2.2] [-26 - 0] FOCAL CAM MORPHOLOGY + PL DEFICIENCYN–8 81 49.7 132.3 5.2 25.3 0.44 0.83 1.8 -14 [72.1 - 87.5] [43.1 - 61.7] [125.9 - 135.1] [1.4 - 10] [18.8 - 35.5] [0.29 - 0.55] [0.58 - 0.98] [1.2 - 2.7] [-28 - 4] LATERAL ACETABULAR DEFICIENCYN–5 58.1 43.8 133.4 5.6 26.5 0.49 0.92 1.8 -11.2 [48 - 64.9] [39 - 49.6] [125.2 - 149.3] [0.4 - 13.4] [14.4 - 34.3] [0.42 - 0.64] [0.78 - 1.11] [1.2 - 2.7] [-22 - 0]
机译:背景:争议围绕臀部的分类和治疗,横向中心边缘角(LCEA)在18°和25°之间。它仍然没有确定开放或关节镜手术是否最好用于治疗横向发育不良的患者。我们假设髋关节疼痛和边界髋关节发育不良的患者具有不同的髋臼形态的特征,而其他相关的射线摄影措施超出洛膜。方法:对2010年1月至2015年12月在2010年1月至2015年12月的患者进行回顾性审查,具有18°和25°之间的LCEA或髋关节镜检查的髋关节术(PAO)或髋关节镜检查。前卵体,DUNN横向和假型X型射线照片用于测量LCEA,T〜NNIS角,前中心边缘角(ACEA),前(AWI)和后(PWI)壁指数,股骨骨骺髋臼屋顶(恐惧)指数,关节空间宽度,交叉符号,后壁标志,p / a索引和股骨α角。然后对连续射线显微变量进行附聚层聚类分析,以识别该患者队列中的不同髋关节群体的不同亚型。髋关节形态存在性别特异性趋势。因此,我们继续为每种性行为进行单独的群集分析。结果:九十九名患者在研究期间进行手术,77(78%)是女性,81(82%)的这些具有完整的射线图像进行聚类分析。平均年龄为22.6岁。髋关节镜检查在41%的患者中进行,并且在59%的患者中进行了终止术骨质术。 ACEA(45%),恐惧指数(34%)和AWI(30%)是所有患者中最常见的射线照相参数。在女性患者中,ACEA(55%),恐惧指数(42%)和AWI(34%)是最常见的射线照相参数。在雄性患者中,PWI不足(48%)是最常见的射线照相异常。对于女性来说,我们确定了三个代表不同模式的髋关节形态模式的簇:冲击形态;横向髋臼缺乏,前外侧髋臼缺乏(表1A)。对于男性,我们确定了三种簇:后横向髋臼缺乏全球凸轮形态,后横向髋臼缺乏,伴随焦点凸起形态,横向髋臼缺乏没有凸轮形态(表1B)。结论:18-25°患者患者放射学参数的综合评价鉴定了髋关节形态的性别特异性趋势,并显示出这些患者中的巨大比例的发育功能。在指示这些髋关节保存手术患者时,应考虑对所有盆腔形态的彻底评估,而不仅仅是横向覆盖。需要进一步的研究来研究每个已识别的簇内的患者的结果,以确定每组的最佳治疗方案。表1a。髋关节形态患者邓姆姆的雌性簇。 alpha角度ap alpha角度fnsa tommis角度acea awi pwi ap索引恐惧指数恐惧射击驯蚤驯蚤 - 10 62.4 68 134 11.6 18.2 0.36 0.95 2.4 -2.5 [46.7 - 84.6] [50.4 - 90.9] [4.2 - 19.1] [4.2 - 19.1] [4.2 - 19.1] [4.2 - 19.1] [4.2 - 19.1] [4.2 - 19.1] [4.2 - 19.1] [4.2 - 19.1] [ 6.3 - 34.6] [0.15 - 0.56] [1.4 - 4.3] [-17-11] [-17-11]横向髋臼缺陷型-16 54.6 41 133.3 3.9 25.4 0.5 0.87 1.7 -9.3 [32.9 - 72.2] [35.7 - 49.6] [125.8 - 141.1] [-3.3 - 110.4] [14.4 - 37.4] [0.23 - 0.69] [0.23 - 0.69] [1.1-2.11] [1.1-2.7] [-26-7]前外侧髋臼缺陷N-35 44 38.7 138.7 12.2 14.6 0.32 0.93 2.7 6.7 [34.1 - 51.4] [30.2 - 46] [ - 3.2-20-148.8] [5.2 - 27.6] [0.08 - 0.59] [0.33 - 1.24] [1.4 - 5.0] [-17]表1b 。髋关节形态男性患者猝灭的男性簇。 alpha角度ap alpha角度fnsa tommis角度acea awi pwi ap索引恐惧索引全球凸轮。形态+ PL DECINGYN-7 69.7 76.5 129.3 5.6 5.6 5.6 25.4 0.39 0.77 1.6 -8.7 [56.3 - 84.0] [120.2 - 134.7] [3.0 - 12.2] [14.9 - 32.1] [14.9 - 32.1] [0.25 - 0.50] [0.63 - 0.5 ] [1.3 - 2.2] [-26 - 0]焦凸型形态+ PL DECINGYN-8 81 49.7 132.3 5.2 25.3 0.44 0.83 1.8 -14 [72.1 - 87.5] [43.1-61.7] [125.9 - 135.1] [125.9 - 135.1] [125.9 - 135.1] [125.9 - 135.1] [125.9 - 135.1] [18.8-35.5] [0.29-0.55] [0.58-0.98] [1.2 - 2.7] [-28-4]横向髋臼缺陷-5 58.1 43.8 133.4 5.6 26.5 0.49 0.92 1.8 -11.2 [48 - 64.9] [39-49.6 ] [125.2 - 149.3] [0.4 - 13.4] [14.4 - 34.3] [0.42 - 0.64] [0.78 - 1.11] [1.2 - 2.7] [-22 - 0]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号