首页> 外文期刊>OncoTargets and therapy >Comparison of detection methods of EGFR T790M mutations using plasma, serum, and tumor tissue in EGFR-TKI-resistant non-small cell lung cancer
【24h】

Comparison of detection methods of EGFR T790M mutations using plasma, serum, and tumor tissue in EGFR-TKI-resistant non-small cell lung cancer

机译:EGFR-TKI抗性非小细胞肺癌中血浆,血清和肿瘤组织 EGFR T790M突变检测方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, exerts remarkable effects against EGFR T790M resistance mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Identifying T790M mutation by re-biopsy is essential before prescribing osimertinib. Tissue biopsy is the golden standard for this purpose, but several factors limit its success rate. The liquid biopsy with blood, using circulating tumor DNA, has been an alternative method. However, the true biological meaning and equivalence of liquid biopsy and tumor biopsy are still under investigation. Especially, the usefulness of serum samples to detect T790M mutation is not yet been known. Patients and methods: We prospectively evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and parallelism of the detection of EGFR mutations in tissue re-biopsy and liquid biopsy (plasma and serum), simultaneously, from June 2016 to May 2017. EGFR mutations in tumor re-biopsy were evaluated by COBAS ver2 and PNA-LNA PCR clamp method, and those in liquid biopsy were evaluated with COBAS ver2. Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled. In 10 patients whose EGFR mutation was detected in liquid biopsy, the original EGFR mutation (exon 19 del or L858R) was detected in all patients. Detection of EGFR mutation by COBAS ver2 and by PNA-LNA method was almost the same in tissue re-biopsy. The detection rate of T790M was lower than that of the original EGFR mutation in liquid biopsy compared to that in tissue re-biopsy. The detection of T790M in serum exhibited a higher specificity (67%) and positive predictive value (50%) than that in plasma (50% and 40%, respectively). The detection sensitivity was similar in plasma and serum. Conclusion: Plasma, serum, and tissue genotyping can have complementary roles for detecting EGFR -T790M using COBAS ver2. Repeated tests with different samples and different methods may improve accuracy of T790M detection and will lead to the maximum benefit for the patient.
机译:背景:Osimertinib是第三代表皮生长因子受体 - 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂对EGFR T790M电阻突变阳性非小细胞肺癌产生了显着的影响。在规定Osimertinib之前,通过重新活检鉴定T790M突变是必不可少的。组织活检是为此目的的黄金标准,但有几个因素限制了其成功率。使用循环肿瘤DNA的血液活组织检查是一种替代方法。然而,仍在调查中进行液体活检和肿瘤活检的真正生物学意义和等同物。特别是,尚不为人所知,血清样品检测T790M突变的有用性。患者和方法:我们预期评估了在2016年6月至2017年5月至2017年5月的组织再活检和液检学(血浆和血清)中EGFR突变检测的敏感性,特异性和平行性。肿瘤重新活组织检查的EGFR突变通过COBAS Ver2和PNA-LNA PCR钳法评估,并用COBAS Ver2评价液检中的那些。结果:15名患者注册。在液检中检测到EGFR突变的10例患者中,在所有患者中检测到原始EGFR突变(外显子19Del或L858R)。通过COBAS Ver2和PCNA-LNA法检测EGFR突变在组织重新检炉中几乎相同。与组织重新活组织检查相比,T790m的检出率低于液体活检中的原始EGFR突变。血清中T790M的检测表现出比血浆(分别为50%和40%)的更高的特异性(67%)和阳性预测值(50%)。检测灵敏度在血浆和血清中类似。结论:血浆,血清和组织基因分型可以具有使用COBAS Ver2检测EGFR -790M的互补作用。具有不同样品和不同方法的重复测试可以提高T790M检测的精度,并将导致患者的最大益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号