首页> 外文期刊>Radiation oncology >Evaluation of OAR dose sparing and plan robustness of beam-specific PTV in lung cancer IMRT treatment
【24h】

Evaluation of OAR dose sparing and plan robustness of beam-specific PTV in lung cancer IMRT treatment

机译:肺癌ICRT治疗中梁特异性PTV的OAR剂量备件评价及计划鲁棒性

获取原文
           

摘要

Margins are employed in radiotherapy treatment planning to mitigate the dosimetric effects of geometric uncertainties for the clinical target volume (CTV). Here, we proposed a margin concept that takes into consideration the beam direction, thereby generating a beam-specific planning target volume (BSPTV) on a beam entrance view. The total merged BSPTV was considered a target for optimization. We investigated the impact of this novel approach for lung intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment, and compared the treatment plans generated using BSPTV with general PTV. We generated the BSPTV by expanding the CTV perpendicularly to the incident beam direction using the 2D version of van Herk’s margin concept. The BSPTV and general PTV margin were analyzed using digital phantom simulation. Fifteen lung cancer patients were used in the planning study. First, all patient targets were performed with the CTV projection area analysis to select the suitable beam angles. Then, BSPTV was generated according to the selected beam angles. IMRT plans were optimized with the general PTV and BSPTV as the target volumes, respectively. The dosimetry metrics were calculated and evaluated between these two plans. The plan robustness of both plans for setup uncertainties was evaluated using worst-case analysis. Both general PTV and BSPTV plans satisfied the CTV coverage. In addition, the BSPTV plans improved the sparing of high doses to target-surrounding lung tissues compared to the general PTV plans. Both Dmean of Ring PTV and Ring BSPTV were significantly lower in BSPTV plans (38.89?Gy and 39.43?Gy) compared to the general PTV plans (40.27?Gy and 40.68?Gy). The V20, V5, and mean lung dose of the affected lung were significant lower in BSPTV plans (16.20%, 28.75% and 8.93?Gy) compared to general PTV plans (16.69%, 29.22% and 9.18?Gy). In uncertainty scenarios, about 80% of target coverage was achieved for both general PTV and BSPTV plans. The results suggested that plan robustness can be guaranteed in both the BSPTV and general PTV plans. However, the BSPTV plan spared normal tissues, such as the lungs, significantly better compared to the general PTV plans.
机译:边距用于放射疗法治疗计划,以减轻几何不确定性对临床目标体积(CTV)的剂量效应。这里,我们提出了一种备受保证金概念,其考虑了光束方向,从而在光束入口视图上产生了比光束的规划目标体积(BSPTV)。总合并的BSPTV被认为是优化的目标。我们调查了这种新颖方法对肺强度调制放疗(IMRT)治疗的影响,并比较了使用BSPTV与通用PTV产生的治疗计划。我们使用2D版本的Van Herk的边缘概念将CTV垂直于入射光束方向扩展CTV来产生BSPTV。使用数字幻影仿真分析BSPTV和通用PTV余量。在规划研究中使用了十五肺癌患者。首先,通过CTV投影区域分析进行所有患者靶,以选择合适的光束角。然后,根据所选择的光束角产生BSPTV。 IMRT计划分别用一般PTV和BSPTV作为目标体积优化。计算和评估这两个计划之间的单模度量。使用最坏情况分析评估设置不确定性计划的计划稳健性。一般PTV和BSPTV计划都满足了CTV覆盖范围。此外,与一般PTV计划相比,BSPTV计划改善了高剂量对靶肺组织的备注。与一般PTV计划相比,BSPTV计划(38.89?GY和39.43)(40.27?GY和40.68?GY)相比,环PTV和Ring BSPTV的Dmean均明显降低(38.89?Gy和39.43?Gy)。与一般PTV计划相比,受影响肺的V20,V5和平均肺剂量在BSPTV计划中显着低(16.20%,28.75%和8.93倍)(16.69%,29.22%和9.18倍)。在不确定性方案中,对于一般PTV和BSPTV计划,实现了大约80%的目标覆盖范围。结果表明,在BSPTV和一般PTV计划中可以保证计划鲁棒性。然而,与一般PTV计划相比,BSPTV计划备受良好的正常组织,如肺部,显着更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号