首页> 外文期刊>Radiation oncology >Immune checkpoint inhibition in patients treated with stereotactic radiation for brain metastases
【24h】

Immune checkpoint inhibition in patients treated with stereotactic radiation for brain metastases

机译:脑转移态辐射治疗患者的免疫检查点抑制作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may act synergistically to improve treatment outcomes but may also increase the risk of symptomatic radiation necrosis (RN). The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for patients undergoing SRT with and without concurrent ICI. Patients treated for BMs with single or multi-fraction SRT were retrospectively reviewed. Concurrent ICI with SRT (SRT-ICI) was defined as administration within 3?months of SRT. Local control (LC), radiation necrosis (RN) risk and distant brain failure (DBF) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Wilcoxon rank sum and Chi-square tests were used to compare covariates. Multivariate cox regression analysis (MVA) was performed. One hundred seventy-nine patients treated with SRT for 385 brain lesions were included; 36 patients with 99 lesions received SRT-ICI. Median follow up was 10.3?months (SRT alone) and 7.7?months (SRT- ICI) (p?=?0.08). Lesions treated with SRT-ICI were more commonly squamous histology (17% vs 8%) melanoma (20% vs 2%) or renal cell carcinoma (8% vs 6%), (p??0.001). Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compromised 60% of patients receiving ICI (n?=?59). Lesions treated with SRT-ICI had significantly improved 1-year local control compared to SRT alone (98 and 89.5%, respectively (p?=?0.0078). On subset analysis of NSCLC patients alone, ICI was also associated with improved 1?year local control (100% vs. 90.1%) (p?=?0.018). On MVA, only tumor size ≤2?cm was significantly associated with LC (HR 0.38, p?=?0.02), whereas the HR for concurrent ICI with SRS was 0.26 (p?=?0.08). One year DBF (41% vs. 53%; p?=?0.21), OS (58% vs. 56%; p?=?0.79) and RN incidence (7% vs. 4%; p?=?0.25) were similar for SRT alone versus SRT-ICI, for the population as a whole and those patients with NSCLC. These results suggest SRT-ICI may improve local control of brain metastases and is not associated with an increased risk of symptomatic radiation necrosis in a cohort of predominantly NSCLC patients. Larger, prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings and better elucidate the impact of SRT-ICI on other disease outcomes.
机译:立体定向放射治疗(SRT)和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)可以协同作用,以改善治疗结果,但也可能增加症状性辐射坏死的风险(RN)。本研究的目的是将患者与未经并发ICI进行了患者的患者进行比较。回顾性地审查了用单次或多级分数进行的BMS治疗的患者。与SRT(SRT-ICI)的并发ICI被定义为3.个月内的管理。局部对照(LC),辐射坏死(RN)风险和遥远的脑衰竭(DBF)估计了Kaplan-Meier方法,并使用日志秩检验比较了组。 Wilcoxon等级和Chi-Square测试用于比较协变量。进行多元COX回归分析(MVA)。包括使用SRT治疗385个脑病变的一百七十九患者; 36例99例病变患者接受了SRT-ICI。后续位数是10.3个月(单独SRT)和7.7个月(SRT-ICI)(P?= 0.08)。用SRT-ICI治疗的病变更常见鳞状组织学(17%vs 8%)黑素瘤(20%vs 2%)或肾细胞癌(8%vs 6%),(p?<0.001)。非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)损害了60%的接受ICI的患者(n?=?59)。与单独的SRT(分别为98和89.5%(P?= 0.0078)相比,用SRT-ICI治疗的病变显着改善了1年的局部控制。单独的NSCLC患者的子集分析,ICI也与改进的1?一年有关局部控制(100%与90.1%)(p?= 0.018)。在MVA上,只有肿瘤大小≤2Ω·cm与LC显着相关(HR 0.38,P?= 0.02),而同时ici SRS为0.26(p?= 0.08)。一年DBF(41%对53%; p?= 0.21),OS(58%与56%; p?= 0.79)和rn发病率(7 %vs.4%; p?= 0.25)与SRT-ICI相似,对于整个人口和NSCLC的患者,这些结果表明SRT-ICI可能改善脑转移的局部控制,而不是在主要的NSCLC患者的群组中症状放射坏死风险增加。较大,前瞻性研究是验证这些发现的必要条件,并更好地阐明SRT-ICI对其他疾病结果的影响。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号