...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiation oncology >Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis
【24h】

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

机译:术后佐剂化疗与节瘤阳性食管鳞状细胞癌的化学疗法:倾向分数匹配分析

获取原文
           

摘要

After esophagectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy (S?+?CT) and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (S?+?CRT) can improve survival in patients with node-positive resectable esophageal cancer. However, we are not aware of any studies that directly compared these adjuvant treatments. This study aimed to compare S?+?CT and S?+?CRT for patients with esophageal cancer. We retrospectively identified patients with node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent S?+?CT or S?+?CRT at Sichuan Cancer Hospital during 2008–2017. The patients’ characteristics were compared, as well as their overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to create balanced patient groups according to adjuvant treatment, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors that predicted the survival outcomes. The 859 eligible patients underwent S?+?CRT (250 patients, 29.1%) or S?+?CT (609 patients, 70.9%). After propensity score matching (247 patients per group), the 5-year OS rates were 41.8% for S?+?CRT and 26.8% for S?+?CT (p?=?0.028), and the 5-year DFS rates were 37.2% for S?+?CRT and 25.5% for S?+?CT (p?=?0.012). Multivariate Cox regression analysis of the matched samples revealed that, relative to the S?+?CT group, the S?+?CRT group had better OS (hazard ratio: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56–0.91; p?=?0.006) and DFS (hazard ratio: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56–0.88; p?=?0.002). Among patients with node-positive resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, S?+?CRT was associated with better OS than S?+?CT. A multicenter randomized clinical trial is warranted to confirm these findings.
机译:在食管切除术后,佐剂化疗(S?+βcT)和佐剂化学疗法(S?+βCrt)可以改善节点阳性可重复食管癌患者的存活。但是,我们不了解任何直接比较这些佐剂治疗的研究。这项研究旨在比较S?+?CT和S?CRT用于食管癌患者。我们回顾性地鉴定了在2008 - 2017年四川癌症医院接受了β+的节点阳性食道鳞状细胞癌癌症患者的患者。比较患者的特征,以及它们的整体存活(OS)和无病生存(DFS)结果。倾向评分匹配用于根据佐剂治疗创造平衡患者组,使用COX比例危害模型来识别预测生存结果的因素。 859符合条件的患者接受了s?+?crt(250名患者,29.1%)或s?+?ct(609例,70.9%)。经过倾向分数匹配(每组247名患者),S的5年的OS速率为S?+ + + + + +ΔCRT的41.8%,S?+?CT(P?= 0.028),以及5年的DFS率S的+ + + + + + + + + + + +的25.5%,为37.2%(p?= 0.012)。匹配样品的多变量Cox回归分析显示,相对于S?+αcT组,S?+αCRT组具有更好的OS(危险比:0.71,95%CI:0.56-0.91; P?= 0.006 )和DFS(危害比率:0.70,95%CI:0.56-0.88; p?= 0.002)。在患有节点阳性可重置食管鳞状细胞癌的患者中,S?+ +ΔCRT比S?+ΔCT相关。保证多中心随机临床试验以确认这些调查结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号