首页> 外文期刊>National Journal of Community Medicine >Healthcare Professionals’ Preparedness for COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Northern India
【24h】

Healthcare Professionals’ Preparedness for COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Northern India

机译:医疗保健专业人员对Covid-19大流行的准备:印度北部的横断面调查

获取原文
       

摘要

"Background: Health care agencies have framed guidelines for healthcare professionals (HCPs) to manage COVID-19 pandemic but still there is paucity of Indian data on HCPs preparedness. Aim: To assess level of perceived preparedness of healthcare profes-sionals against COVID-19. Method: This cross-sectional study included 1218 HCPs (nurses, physi-cians and technicians) from gov-ernment and private institutes through convenient sampling tech-nique. Online survey was done to assess preparedness of HCPs against COVID-19, using self-structured questionnaire based on HCPs preparedness checklists re-leased by WHO and CDC. Results: Only 42.4% HCPs consid-ered themselves prepared for don-ning and doffing of PPE and around 65.8% were confident in providing direct patient care. Gender had sig-nificant difference (P0.001) on level of perceived preparedness of HCPs. Younger participants shown higher level of preparedness than older participants (P=0.022). Technicians were less prepared with significant-ly low mean scores 10.36±2.55 than nurses (11.45±2.45) and physicians (11.68±2.17; p=.038). HCPs working in tertiary level institutes had signif-icantly higher mean preparedness scores (11.86±2.89; P.001) than those working in primary (10.49±2.68) and secondary level in-stitutes (10.57±2.35). Conclusion: All HCPs should be strongly encouraged for regular par-ticipation in training and simula-tion exercises arranged by institute as continuing education, which may enhance their preparedness against COVID-19 pandemic.
机译:“背景:医疗机构已经为医疗保健专业人员(HCP)框架的指导方针来管理Covid-19大流行,但仍然存在关于HCP准备的印度数据的缺乏。目的:评估医疗保健专业赛季的含量对Covid-19的水平。 。方法:通过方便的采样技术,包括来自Gov-Ernment和私人机构的1218个HCP(护士,物理学家)。在线调查完成,以评估HCP对Covid-19的准备,使用自我 - 基于HCP准备的问卷调查表通过世卫组织和CDC重新租赁。结果:为唐宁和PPE的脱达,只有42.4%的HCPS编制,大约65.8%,对提供直接患者护理有信心。性别有一个 - 差异(p <0.001)对HCP的确认水平。年轻参与者显示比老年参与者更高的准备水平(P = 0.022)。技术人员较少准备Ly-Ly低平均分数10.36±2.55比护士(11.45±2.45)和医生(11.68±2.17; p = .038)。在三级级研究所工作的HCP具有比在初级(10.49±2.68)和次级含量(10.57±2.35)上工作的那些(11.86±2.89; p <.001)。结论:应当强烈鼓励所有HCP在研究所安排作为持续教育的培训和模拟练习中,这可能会加强对Covid-19大流行的准备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号