...
首页> 外文期刊>Kansas Journal of Medicine >Implementation in a Family Medicine Clinic of a Lifestyle Program Designed to Help Indigent, Obese Adult Patients Lose Weight
【24h】

Implementation in a Family Medicine Clinic of a Lifestyle Program Designed to Help Indigent, Obese Adult Patients Lose Weight

机译:在一个生活方式计划的家庭医学诊所的实施,旨在帮助贫困,肥胖成年患者减肥

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction. Efficacy of interventions in research settings maynot translate to usual-care settings. The impact of interventionsvaries depending upon factors, such as the proportion andcomposition of the population reached and engaged, as well asparticipation and implementation characteristics of providers.Methods. A lifestyle intervention meant to achieve a 5%loss of body weight in six months was offered to obese, indigentadult patients in a Family Medicine residency outpatientclinic. Implementation variables were assessed, includingdetermination of individual patient penetrationand participation rate, demographic representativeness,completion rate, outcomes, and differential impact, as wellas setting participation rates and implementation fidelity.Results. From a population of 743 potentially eligible patients,356 were invited to participate (48% penetration) and158 were enrolled (44% participation). Those enrolled wereheavier (BMI of 42.6 vs 39.0), younger (43.5 vs 47.0 years)and more likely female (87% vs 69%) than those not enrolled.Individual completion rate was 81%; overall weightloss was negligible. Setting participation was broad, butfidelity to background standard of care was only 50%.Conclusions. Providers were eager for a tool to help their obese,indigent patients lose weight, but the intervention proved ineffectiveand the usual care of enrolled patients was not stronglysupportive of their weight loss efforts. KS J Med 2016;9(4):77-82.
机译:介绍。研究中的干预措施的疗效Maynot转化为通常的护理环境。干预措施的影响取决于因素,例如人口的比例和达成和参与的比例,以及提供者的alparticipation和实施特征。方法。在家庭医学居住临近临床临床临床临床临床临床临床案中,为肥胖的患者提供了达到六个月的5%体重减轻体重的5%的干预。评估实施变量,包括单个患者普查和参与率,人口代表性,完成率,结果和差异影响,作为莲花设置参与率和实施保真。结果。从743名潜在符合条件的患者中,356名被邀请参加(48%的渗透率)和158名注册(参加44%)。那些被竞选的狼人(BMI为42.6 vs 39.0),年轻(43.5 vs 47.0岁)和更有可能的女性(87%vs 69%)而不是未注册。单独的完成率为81%;整体减肥可以忽略不计。设定参与广泛,对后果标准的保险条件仅为50%.Conclusions。提供者渴望帮助他们肥胖的工具,贫困患者减肥,但干预证明inffefectiveand患有注册患者的通常护理并不强烈地支持其体重减轻努力。 KS J Med 2016; 9(4):77-82。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号