首页> 外文期刊>Molecular Autism >The Friendship Questionnaire, autism, and gender differences: a study revisited
【24h】

The Friendship Questionnaire, autism, and gender differences: a study revisited

机译:友谊调查问卷,自闭症和性别差异:重新审视研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:The Friendship Questionnaire (FQ) is a widely used measure of friendships in autism research and beyond. This study sought to revisit the original paper where the measure was presented, using a larger sample of both autistic and non-autistic participants to examine gender differences in scoring. It also sought to expand upon the original paper by comparing FQ results to those of the Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS), to examine whether there are differences in how autistic people report on their general friendships in contrast to their most significant relationships.Methods:Participants were recruited for an online study, and 949 people (532 autistic, 417 non-autistic) aged between 18 and 81 took part. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire, the Autism Quotient-28, the Friendship Questionnaire, and the Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale.Results:We used robust regressions and Pearson's correlational analyses, conducted in R. Autistic people scored lower than non-autistic people on the FQ, and similar gender differences in the pattern of FQ scores were seen in both groups. There was a significant negative correlation between AQ and FQ scores in both groups. On the URCS, we took the data from those who rated specific close relationships and found that autistic people scored this relationship more highly than non-autistic adults did. There was a significant negative correlation between AQ and URCS scores in both groups. Also, in both groups, there was a significant positive correlation between FQ and URCS scores.Limitations:The data is entirely self-report, and diagnoses could not be verified with a clinician, although AQ scores support self-identification as autistic. Also, the groups were not evenly matched on age and other demographic variables, although this was controlled for in analyses. It is also the case that more autistic than non-autistic people were unable to specify a close relationship to score on the URCS, meaning that a certain set of experiences are not represented in this data.Conclusions:We conclude that our data replicates the core finding of the original FQ paper that autistic people score lower on the FQ. In contrast to that paper, however, we found that there were gender differences among the autistic population. Also, our inclusion of the URCS suggests that the intimate romantic relationships and best-friendships of autistic people can be of similar quality to those of non-autistic people, suggesting that there may be important differences in autistic people's relations with friends in general versus close friends and romantic partners.? The Author(s). 2019.
机译:背景:友谊调查问卷(FQ)是一种广泛使用的自闭症研究和超越友谊的衡量标准。这项研究试图通过自闭症和非自闭症参与者的更大样本来检测衡量标准的原始纸张来检查评分的性别差异。它还试图通过将FQ结果与单向关系近距离(URC)的比较来扩展原始纸张,以检查自闭症人们如何与最重要的关系报告其普遍友谊的差异。方法:参与者被招募在线学习,949人(532人自闭症,417名非自闭症)在18至81人之间参加。与会者完成了人口调查问卷,自闭症课程 - 28,友谊调查问卷和非妇女关系的亲密关系。结果:我们使用了强大的回归和Pearson的相关分析,在R.自闭症人员中得分低于FQ上的非自闭症人士在这两个群体中看到了FQ分数模式的类似性别差异。两组的AQ和FQ分数之间存在显着的负相关性。在URC上,我们从那些评定了特定的密切关系的人那里拿走了这些数据,发现自闭症人士比非自闭症成年人更高度得分这种关系。两个组中的AQ和URC分数之间存在显着的负相关性。此外,在这两个组中,FQ和URC分数之间存在显着的正相关性。闪光灯:数据完全是自我报告,但诊断不能用临床医生验证,尽管AQ分数支持自动识别自我识别。此外,在年龄和其他人口变量上没有均匀地匹配,尽管这是在分析中控制的。还有比非自闭症的自闭症更自闭式无法指定在URC上得分的密切关系,这意味着在此数据中没有表示某种体验.Conclusions:我们得出结论,我们的数据复制了核心发现自闭症的原始FQ纸张在FQ上得分降低。然而,与此纸张相比,我们发现自闭症人口之间存在性别差异。此外,我们纳入URC表明,自闭症的私密关系和自闭症的私密关系和最佳友谊可能与非自闭症人民的质量相似,这表明自闭症与朋友的关系可能存在重要差异,而不是关闭朋友和浪漫的合作伙伴。作者。 2019年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号