...
首页> 外文期刊>Military Medical Research >Cross-sectional study of the educational background and trauma knowledge of trainees in the “China trauma care training” program
【24h】

Cross-sectional study of the educational background and trauma knowledge of trainees in the “China trauma care training” program

机译:“中国创伤培训”计划教育背景和创伤知识的横截面研究

获取原文

摘要

Background: Since the trauma knowledge of trauma providers correlates with the outcomes of injured patients, this study aims to assess the socio-demographic characteristics and levels of trauma knowledge of trainees in the China trauma care training (CTCT) program in addition to their post-course test results to provide support for the development of trauma care training programs and trauma systems in China. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted by collecting demographic information, hospital-related information and trauma knowledge of the trainees from 19 regions in China. All participants were assessed by questionnaires collecting the socio-demographic data, the trauma care knowledge levels and the information of the hospitals. Results: There were 955 males (78.9%) and 256 females (21.1%) enrolled. Among them, 854 were physicians (70.5%), 357 were registered nurses (29.5%). In addition, 64 of them also played an administrative role in the hospitals (5.3%). The score of the trainees who were members of the emergency department staff (72.59 ± 14.13) was the highest among the scores of all the personnel surveyed, followed by those of the trainees from the intensive care unit (ICU) (71.17 ± 12.72), trauma surgery department (67.26 ± 13.81), orthopedics department (70.36 ± 14.48), general surgery department (69.91 ± 14.79) and other departments (69.93 ± 16.91), P = 0.031. The score of the professors (73.09 ± 15.05) was higher than those of the associate professors (72.40 ± 14.71), lecturers (70.07 ± 14.25) and teaching assistants (67.58 ± 15.16), P 0.0001. The score of the individuals who attended experts’ trauma lectures (72.22 ± 14.45) was higher than that of individuals who did not attend the lectures (69.33 ± 15.17), P = 0.001. The mean scores before and after the training were 71.02 ± 14.82 and 84.24 ± 13.77, respectively, P 0.001. The mean score of trauma knowledge after the training of trainees from different provinces and with different educational backgrounds was higher than that before the training, with a statistically significant difference (P 0.05). Conclusions: The level of trauma knowledge of trauma care providers was associated with their department, professional position and previous participation in related academic conferences. Trauma care experience and participation in academic lectures and training program including CTCT may effectively improve individuals’ level of trauma knowledge.
机译:背景:由于创伤的创伤知识与受伤患者的结果相关,这项研究旨在评估中国创伤培训(CTCT)计划的社会人口统计学特征和创伤知识的创伤知识。课程测试结果为在中国开发创伤护理培训计划和创伤系统的支持。方法:通过收集来自中国19个地区的人口统计信息,医院相关信息和创伤知识进行横截面研究。所有参与者都是通过收集社会人口统计数据的问卷评估,创伤护理知识水平和医院信息。结果:655名男性(78.9%)和256名女性(21.1%)注册。其中,854名是医生(70.5%),357名是注册护士(29.5%)。此外,其中64个也在医院中发挥了行政作用(5.3%)。作为急诊署人员的成员(72.59±14.13)的学员的分数是受调查的所有人员的分数中最高的,其次是来自重症监护单位(ICU)的受训人员(71.17±12.72),创伤外科(67.26±13.81),骨科部门(70.36±14.48),普通外科部门(69.91±14.79)和其他部门(69.93±16.91),P = 0.031。教授的得分(73.09±15.05)高于副教授(72.40±14.71),讲师(70.07±14.25)和教学助手(67.58±15.16),P <0.0001。参加专家创伤讲座的个人的得分(72.22±14.45)高于未参加讲座的个人(69.33±15.17),p = 0.001。培训前后的平均评分分别为71.02±14.82和84.24±13.77,P <0.001。在不同省份和不同教育背景培训学员培训后的创伤知识的平均得分高于训练前的患者,统计学上显着差异(P <0.05)。结论:创伤者护理提供者的创伤程度与他们的部门,专业职位和之前参与相关的学术会议有关。创伤体育经验和参与学术讲座和培训计划,包括CTCT,有效地改善了个体的创伤知识水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号