首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Diagnostic accuracy of red blood cell distribution width to platelet ratio for predicting staging liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Diagnostic accuracy of red blood cell distribution width to platelet ratio for predicting staging liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:红细胞分布宽度对慢性肝病患者分期肝纤维化血小板比的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Red cell volume distribution width to platelet ratio (RPR), as a novel noninvasive assessment, is frequently investigated. However, the utility of RPR to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of RPR for detecting staging liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease . Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC), diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of RPR. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were also performed to identify factors that contributed to heterogeneity. The Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was applied to assess the quality. Results: Fifteen studies with a total of 3346 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The area under the curve for SROC to summarize diagnostic accuracy of RPR for prediction of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis was 0.73 (standard error [SE] = 0.02), 0.83 (SE = 0.03), and 0.85 (SE = 0.04), respectively. Pooled DOR with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was 4.93 (95% CI: 3.78–6.43), 10.27 (95% CI: 6.26–16.84), and 12.16 (95% CI: 5.85–25.28), respectively, using a random effects model. Meta-regression showed that length of liver biopsy specimen potentially contributed to heterogeneity. There was no significant publication bias observed across the eligible studies. Conclusions: In chronic liver disease patients, RPR presented a good performance for prediction of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis. More future trials are required for prospective validation.
机译:背景:经常调查作为血小板比(RPR)的红细胞体积分布宽度,作为新型非侵入性评估。然而,RPR评价肝纤维化诊断准确性的效用仍然存在争议。我们进行了荟萃分析,以确定RPR检测慢性肝病患者分期肝纤维化的诊断性能。方法:系统地搜索Medline,Embase和Cochrane库数据库。发明内容接收器操作特征曲线(SROC),诊断差异比(DOR),汇集敏感性,特异性和似然比的汇总估计来评估RPR的诊断准确性。还进行了元回归和亚组分析,以确定导致非均相的因素。应用诊断准确性研究-2工具的研究质量评估评估质量。结果:在荟萃分析中,共有3346名患者的十五项研究。 SROC曲线下的面积总结RPR的诊断准确性以预测显着纤维化,晚期纤维化和肝硬化为0.73(标准误差[SE] = 0.02),0.83(SE = 0.03)和0.85(SE = 0.04) , 分别。具有相应的95%置信区间(CI)的汇集DOR为4.93(95%CI:3.78-6.43),10.27(95%CI:6.26-16.84)和12.16(95%CI:5.85-25.28),使用A随机效果模型。荟萃回归表明,肝活检标本的长度可能导致异质性。在合格的研究中没有显着的出版物偏见。结论:在慢性肝病患者中,RPR呈现了预测显着纤维化,晚期纤维化和肝硬化的良好性能。预期验证需要更新的试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号