首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Why the Proximal Splenic Artery Approach is the Ideal Approach for Laparoscopic Suprapancreatic Lymph Node Dissection in Advanced Gastric Cancer? A Large-Scale Vascular-Anatomical-Based Study
【24h】

Why the Proximal Splenic Artery Approach is the Ideal Approach for Laparoscopic Suprapancreatic Lymph Node Dissection in Advanced Gastric Cancer? A Large-Scale Vascular-Anatomical-Based Study

机译:为什么近端脾动脉方法是晚期胃癌中腹腔镜术淋巴结清扫术的理想方法?大规模的血管解剖学研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node (LN) dissection has not yet been widely adopted for advanced gastric cancer because it is technically complicated. Due to the high suprapancreatic lymph nodes metastasis rate (LMR) and the various vascular anatomies, the suprapancreatic LN dissection is a crucial and demanding procedure for radical resection of gastric cancer. To explore the anatomical basis of the proximal splenic artery (SA) approach for laparoscopic suprapancreatic LN dissection and its application in advanced gastric cancer. Laparoscopic suprapancreatic LN dissections were performed in 1551 consecutive advanced gastric cancer patients between June 2007 and November 2013. A total of 994 consecutive patients since January 2011 were selected to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes between the conventional approach group (330) and the proximal SA approach group (664). In the proximal SA approach, the No. 11p LNs are dissected first, followed by the Nos. 9, 7, and 8a LNs; dissection of the Nos. 5 and 12a LNs is performed last. In the suprapancreatic arteries, the proximal SA had the lowest anatomic variation rate ( P < 0.05, each) and maximum diameter ( P < 0.05, each) compared with the common hepatic artery (CHA), left gastric artery (LGA), right gastric artery (RGA), and gastroduodenal artery (GDA). In addition, the proximal SA was located closer to the suprapancreatic border than the CHA ( P = 0.000). The No. 11p LMR was lower than the Nos. 9, 7, 8a, 5, and 12a LMR ( P < 0.01, each). Compared with the conventional approach, the proximal SA approach was associated with less blood loss ( P < 0.05), significantly more retrieved total LNs and suprapancreatic LNs ( P < 0.01, each). The proximal SA exhibits the most constant and maximum diameter, is located closer to the suprapancreatic border, and exhibits the lowest LMR; therefore, the proximal SA approach is the ideal approach for laparoscopic suprapancreatic LN dissection in advanced gastric cancer.
机译:对于D2淋巴结(LN)解剖的腹腔镜胃切除术尚未广泛用于晚期胃癌,因为它在技术上复杂。由于高副丹帕克淋巴结转移率(LMR)和各种血管解剖,逐副丹帕克喃灭绝解剖是胃癌根治切除的关键和苛刻程序。探讨腹腔镜六丙二醛植物疏松动脉(SA)方法的解剖学依据腹腔镜逐杀伤LN解剖及其在晚期胃癌中的应用。在2007年6月和2013年11月期间,在1551次连续的晚期胃癌患者中进行了腹腔镜血管癌。自2011年1月以来,共选出994名连续患者,以比较常规方法组(330)和近端之间的临床病理特征和外科检查SA方法组(664)。在近端SA方法中,首先解剖11P LNS,然后是第9,7,7和8A LNS进行解剖;解剖第5和12A LNS的最后一次。在素丹甘蔗动脉中,与常见的肝动脉(CHA),左胃动脉(LGA),右胃(LGA),右胃(LGA),右胃动脉(LGA),右胃动脉(LGA),右胃动脉(LGA),右胃动脉(LGA),右胃动脉(P <0.05,每)和最大直径(P <0.05,每次)具有最低的解剖学变异率(P <0.05,每次)动脉(RGA)和胃肠细胞动脉(GDA)。此外,近端SA位于比CHA(P = 0.000)更靠近逐帕特奇的边界。 No.11p LMR低于No.9,7,8a,5和12a lmr(每个P <0.01)。与传统方法相比,近端SA方法与较少的血液损失有关(P <0.05),显着检索的总LNS和逐副丹甘蔗株(每种P <0.01)。近端SA表现出最恒定和最大直径,位于逐普兰帕克丹科奇边界,展示最低的LMR;因此,近端SA方法是晚期胃癌中腹腔镜逐颌骨剖析的理想方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号