...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Education Online >Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions’ item writing flaws
【24h】

Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions’ item writing flaws

机译:海湾合作委员会的牙科教师知识多项选择问题的项目写作缺陷

获取原文
           

摘要

Multiple-Choice Questions provide an objective cost/time effective assessment. Deviationfrom appropriate question writing structural guidelines will most probably result in com-monly ignored multiple-choice questions writing flaws, influencing the ability of the assess-ment to measure students’ cognitive levels thereby seriously affecting students’ academicperformance outcome measures. To gauge the knowledge of multiple-choice question itemswriting flaws in dental faculty working at colleges in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) coun-tries. A cross-sectional short online Survey Monkey TM multiple-choice questions-based ques-tionnaire was disseminated to dental faculty working in GCC countries during theacademic year 2018/2019. The questionnaire included five test incorrect (flawed) multiple-choice questions and one correct control question. The participants were asked to identifyflawed multiple-choice question items from the known 14 items writing flaws. Out of a totalof 460 faculty, 216 respondents completed the questionnaires, 132 (61.1%) were from SaudiArabia, while numbers of participants from United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Oman were 59(27.3), 14 (6.5%) and 11 (5.1%) respectively. Majority of participants were male (n = 141,65.9%) compared to 73 females (34.1%). Eighty percent of the participants possessed morethan five years of teaching experience. Assistant professors constituted the majority (43.3%)of the academic positions participating in this study. The overall fail rate ranged from 76.3%to 98.1% and almost 2/3 rds of the participants were unable to identify one or more of theflawed item(s). No significant association was observed between the demographics (age,region, academic position and specialty) and knowledge except that of participant’s gender(p < 0.009). GCC dental faculty demonstrated below average knowledge of multiple-choicequestion items writing flaws. Training and workshops are needed to ensure substantialexposure to proper multiple-choice question items construction standards.
机译:多项选择问题提供了客观成本/时间有效评估。偏差根据适当的问题编写结构指南将大概导致Com-Monly忽略了编写缺陷的多项选择性问题,影响评估衡量学生认知水平的能力,从而严重影响学生的学术表现形式措施。衡量海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家在高校工作中牙科教师的多项选择问题的知识。以横断面的短期在线调查猴子TM多项选择问题为基础的资质,在2018/2019年术语术语中,在GCC国家工作的牙科教师。调查问卷包括五个测试不正确(有缺陷)多项选择题和一个正确的控制问题。要求参与者从已知的14项写入缺陷的项目中识别多项选择问题。在460个教师中,216名受访者完成了问卷,132名(61.1%)来自Saudiarabia,而阿拉伯联合酋长国,科威特和阿曼的参与者数量为59(27.3),14(6.5%)和11名(5.1%) ) 分别。与73名女性相比,大多数参与者(N = 141,65.9%)(34.1%)。百分之八十的参与者拥有媒体五年的教学经验。助理教授构成了参与本研究的大多数(43.3%)的学术职位。总体失败率范围从76.3%到98.1%,而几乎2/3的参与者无法识别一个或多个氟化物品。在除参与者的性别的人口统计学(年龄,区域,学术职位和专业和专业)和知识之间没有观察到任何重大关联(P <0.009)。 GCC牙科教师展示了普及缺陷的多重选择项目的平均知识。需要培训和研讨会来确保适当的多项选择问题项目建设标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号