首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Response: Commentary: The Human Default Consciousness and Its Disruption: Insights From an EEG Study of Buddhist Jhāna Meditation
【24h】

Response: Commentary: The Human Default Consciousness and Its Disruption: Insights From an EEG Study of Buddhist Jhāna Meditation

机译:答复:评论:人类违约意识及其中断:佛教jhāna冥想的脑电图研究中的见解

获取原文
           

摘要

I will deal with Fell et al.'s ( 2019 ) comments in order. The meditation spindles and slow waves described in my paper, Dennison ( 2019 ), are reminiscent, but only reminiscent of sleep EEG. The methodology was to analyse similarities and differences to determine whether they represent a sub-group of sleep activity, or different mechanisms. Spindles Meditation spindles were indeed found to be sufficiently different to both slow and fast sleep spindles to indicate a different mechanism. The authors appear to have misread or misunderstood this methodology and their comment, “he [Dennison] still interprets his observations as related to sleep-like activity” is puzzling, and their further comment “he nonetheless interprets them to reflect the thalamocortical dynamics characteristic of sleep spindles” is both inaccurate and misleading. My argument was that thalamo-cortical networks are likely to be involved since the thalamus is generally regarded as the only brain region capable via the reticular nuclei of triggering spindle and indeed spike-wave behavior (Avanzini et al., 2000 ). Also, since spindles whether in meditation, sleep, attentional distraction, or anesthesia share a common theme of disruption to attention, it is reasonable to assume that all those modalities involve thalamo-cortical mechanisms, albeit with different network characteristics. Fell et al. ( 2019 ) further state that meditation spindle spectral peaks “overlap perfectly” with typical alpha activity, which is patently incorrect ( Figure 1 , upper panel): there is a limited overlap with the low alpha band, and the meditation spectral peaks at 8.63 and 9.20 Hz are significantly lower than the central alpha peak of 10.00 Hz. Figure 1 Meditation spindles. Top panel from Dennison ( 2019 ), Figure 2, shows spindle density, duration, amplitude and frequency in sensor space from visual inspection according to American Academy of Sleep Medicine guidelines [American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM), 2017 ]. The lower panel is one of three examples from Dennison ( 2019 ), Figure 1, showing the symmetrical waxing and waning wave-packet-like morphology of spindles. Their comment that “alpha activity is typical for waking rest” is of course correct, but their continuation “and like sleep spindles, shows waxing and waning activity patterns” is misleading. The term “spindles” describes a defined , recognizable and quantifiable symmetrical waxing and waning whether referring to stage-2 sleep, attentional distraction, early-stage anesthesia, or in this case meditation. The characteristic wave-packet-like morphology is shown in the lower panel of Figure 1 . My hypothesis that meditation spindles represent a disruption of alpha activity into spindle-like behavior is not unrelated to other situations of attentional distraction, except that in meditation the frequency is progressively lowered into the theta band as meditation experience increases ( Figure 1 , upper panel; two cohorts). The analysis in source space supports attentional distraction of the dorsal and ventral attention streams, consistent with Buddhist theories of jhāna meditation. Infraslow Waves (ISWs) Similarly, meditational ISWs differ significantly from slow waves in sleep, indicating a different mechanism. Fell et al. ( 2019 ) comment “the author acknowledges this difference, but nonetheless relates this phenomenon to sleep-like activity” is again very puzzling. I am astonished at Fell et al.'s ( 2019 ) suggestion that these rhythmic ISWs might be sweat artifacts, no doubt familiar to the authors through working in polysomnography and nighttime epilepsy monitoring. Sweat artifacts are easily recognized (and remedied) and invariably caused by subjects becoming overheated, often accompanied by disturbed electrode connectivity through tossing and turning during sleep. In contrast, meditation subjects are recorded in spacious well-ventilated rooms, wear light clothing, are relaxed and certainly not overheated. Impedances are carefully monitored before and after recordings and at least once during recording to confirm electrode contact integrity. The fact that meditational ISW characteristics are consistent across subjects, some re-recorded after 1–3 years, with different amplifier and headcap combinations, supports the integrity of the findings. Furthermore, the bottom panels of Figures 4 and 5 in Dennison ( 2019 ) show examples of rapid onset of powerful ISWs shortly after the cue to “start meditation”; most unlikely in my view to coincide with a sudden onset of acute sweating. Fell et al. ( 2019 ) also suggest, dismissively, that meditational ISWs might be part of already “established phenomena,” and cite Watson ( 2018 ). In fact, Watson notes that ISWs are “a relatively understudied phenomenon,” with many questions unanswered as to their significance and origin, which in the absence of “causal experiments” may remain unanswered. Their occurrence in jhāna meditation is a unique and as far as
机译:我会处理堕落等人。(2019年)按顺序评论。我的论文中描述的冥想主轴和慢波,丹尼逊(2019年)是让人想起的,但仅让人想起睡眠脑电图。方法是分析相似性和差异,以确定它们是否代表睡眠活动的子组或不同的机制。 Spindles冥想主轴确实发现与慢速睡眠锭子有足够的不同,以表示不同的机制。作者似乎误解或误解了这种方法和他们的评论,“他[丹尼森]仍然将他的观察解释为与睡眠类似的活动”是令人困惑的,他们的进一步评论“,他仍然解释他们反映了他们的ThalamoCoric动态特征睡眠主轴“既不准确和误导。我的论点是,由于丘脑通常被视为唯一通过触发主轴和实际尖刺波行为的唯一脑区(Avanzini等,2000),因此可能涉及Thalamo-Cortical网络。此外,由于纺织术语,无论是在冥想,睡眠,注意力分心,或麻醉中都有一个常见的主题,它是合理的,假设所有这些模式都涉及硫疗机制,尽管具有不同的网络特征。堕落等。 (2019)(2019)进一步说明冥想主轴光谱峰值“完全重叠”,典型的α活动,这显然是不正确的(图1,上面板):与低α带有有限的重叠,并且在8.63和8.63时的冥想光谱峰值9.20Hz显着低于10.00Hz的中央α峰值。图1冥想主轴。根据美国睡眠医学学会[美国睡眠学院(AASM),2017],来自Dennison(2019),图2,图2,显示了传感器空间中传感器空间中的主轴密度,持续时间,幅度和频率。下面的面板是Dennison(2019),图1的三个例子中的三种例子中的三种例子,显示了主轴的对称打蜡和衰落的波浪分组形态。他们的评论认为,“alpha活动是典型的唤醒休息”当然是正确的,但他们的延续“和睡眠主轴,显示打蜡和衰落的活动模式”是误导性的。术语“主轴”描述了定义的,可识别和可量化的对称打蜡和衰退是否参考阶段-2睡眠,注意力分散,早期麻醉,或在这种情况下冥想。特征波分组形态显示在图1的下图中。我假设冥想主轴代表α活度的破坏与主轴的行为与注意力分散的其他情况无关,除了在冥想中,随着冥想经验的增加,频率逐渐降低到θ频段中(图1,上图;两个队列)。源空间分析支持背部和腹部注意力的注意力分散,与Jhāna冥想的佛教理论一致。 Incaslow Wave(ISW)类似地,冥想的ISW在睡眠中的慢波中显着不同,表明不同的机制。堕落等。 (2019年)评论“作者承认这种差异,但仍然将这种现象与睡眠相似的活动”又非常令人费解。我在弗洛尔等人令人惊讶。(2019年)建议这些节奏ISW可能是汗水艺术品,毫无疑问通过在PolySomNography和夜间癫痫监测中工作。汗液伪影容易被识别(并纠正),并且由于受试者被过热而引起的,通常通过在睡眠期间折腾和转动时伴随着干扰的电极连接。相比之下,冥想科目在宽敞的通风房间记录,戴着轻型衣服,宽松,肯定不会过热。在记录之前和之后仔细监测阻抗,并且在记录期间至少一次进行一次,以确认电极接触完整性。 Meditational ISW特征在于跨对象的特征是一致的,在1 - 3年后重新录制,具有不同的放大器和头卡组合,支持调查结果的完整性。此外,图4和5的底板在Dennison(2019)中显示了在提示后不久的强大isws快速发作的示例,以“开始冥想”;最不太可能在我看来与突然出现的急性出汗突然吻合。堕落等。 (2019年)还建议,冥想isws可能是已经“成立现象”的一部分,并引用了Watson(2018年)。事实上,沃森指出,isws是“相对清白的现象”,许多问题尚未解释其重要性和起源,在没有“因果实验”的情况下可能仍未得到答复。他们在jhāna冥想中的发生是一个独特的,据

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号