...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Pharmacology >Multiple Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety for Seven Treatments in Tibia Shaft Fracture Patients
【24h】

Multiple Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety for Seven Treatments in Tibia Shaft Fracture Patients

机译:胫骨骨折患者七种治疗的疗效和安全性的多重比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: A tibia shaft fracture is one of the most common long bone fractures, with two general types, open fracture and close fracture. However, there is no universally accepted guideline suggesting which treatment to use under certain circumstances. Therefore, a comprehensive network meta-analysis (NMA) is needed to summarize existing studies and to provide more credible data-based medical guidelines. Methods: Available literature was identified by searching medical databases with relevant key terms. Studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, baseline, intervention, and the outcome of treatments, were extracted. A comparative connection of these studies was demonstrated through net plots. Continuous variables and binary variables were reported as mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with a 95% credible interval (CrI), respectively. The comparison of direct and indirect outcome and their P -value were listed in the node-splitting table. Treatments for each endpoint were ranked by their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value. A heat plot was created to illustrate the contribution of raw data and the inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons. Results: According to the search strategy, 697 publications were identified, and 25 records were included, involving 3,032 patients with tibia shaft fractures. Seven common surgical or non-surgical treatments, including reamed intramedullary nailing (RIN), un-reamed intramedullary nailing (UIN), minimally reamed intramedullary nailing (MIN), ender nailing (EN), external fixation (EF), plate, and cast, were compared, in terms of time to union, reoperation, non-union, malunion, infection and implant failure. Plate performed relatively better for time to union, while cast might be the best choice in close cases to reduce the risks of reoperation, non-union, malunion, and infection. To prevent implant failure, EN seemed to be better. Conclusion: Cast might have the highest probability of the most optimal choice for tibia shaft fracture in close cases, while reamed intramedullary nailing ranked second.
机译:背景:胫骨轴断裂是最常见的长骨骨折之一,具有两种一般类型,开裂骨折和近骨折。但是,没有普遍接受的指导准则表明在某些情况下使用这种治疗方法。因此,需要全面的网络元分析(NMA)来总结现有的研究,并提供更可靠的基于数据的医学指南。方法:通过以相关关键术语搜索医疗数据库来识别可用文献。提取符合纳入和排除标准,基线,干预和治疗结果的研究。通过网图证明了这些研究的比较联系。连续变量和二进制变量报告为平均差异(MD)和差距(或)分别具有95%可信间隔(CRI)。在节点分裂表中列出了直接和间接结果的比较及其p-value。每个端点的治疗在累积排名曲线(SUCRA)值下由它们的表面排名。创建了一个热图,以说明原始数据的贡献和直接和间接比较之间的不一致。结果:根据搜索策略,确定了697个出版物,包括25条记录,涉及3,032名胫骨骨折骨折。七种常见的外科或非手术治疗,包括令人束缚的髓内钉(rin),未加入的髓内钉(Uin),微小的髓内钉(min),eNER钉(en),外固定(EF),板和施放在向联合,重新组合,非unun,malonion,感染和植入物失败方面进行比较。板材表现得相对较好的时间,而施放可能是紧密案例中的最佳选择,以减少重新进入,非联合,羊驼和感染的风险。为了防止植入物失败,Zh似乎更好。结论:铸造可能对胫骨轴断裂最佳选择最佳的概率最高,而令人束定的髓内钉排名第二。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号